Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37468950›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2023

Proton therapy and oral mucositis in oral & oropharyngeal cancers: outcomes, dosimetric and NTCP benefit.

Sapna Nangia, Utpal Gaikwad, M P Noufal, Mayur Sawant, Manoj Wakde, Ashwathy Mathew, Srinivas Chilukuri, Dayananda Sharma, Rakesh Jalali

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sapna NangiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Dr. Vikram Sarabhai Instronic Estate, Taramani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. sapna_nangia@outlook.com.
Utpal GaikwadDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Dr. Vikram Sarabhai Instronic Estate, Taramani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
M P NoufalDepartment of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Mayur SawantDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Manoj WakdeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Dr. Vikram Sarabhai Instronic Estate, Taramani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ashwathy MathewDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Dr. Vikram Sarabhai Instronic Estate, Taramani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Srinivas ChilukuriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Dr. Vikram Sarabhai Instronic Estate, Taramani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Dayananda SharmaDepartment of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Rakesh JalaliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Dr. Vikram Sarabhai Instronic Estate, Taramani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Apollo Proton Cancer Centre · INTata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRadiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM), is a common, debilitating, acute side effect of radiotherapy for oral cavity (OC) and oropharyngeal (OPx) cancers; technical innovations for reducing it are seldom discussed. Intensity-modulated-proton-therapy (IMPT) has been reported extensively for treating OPx cancers, and less frequently for OC cancers. We aim to quantify the reduction in the likelihood of RIOM in treating these 2 subsites with IMPT compared to Helical Tomotherapy. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe report acute toxicities and early outcomes of 22 consecutive patients with OC and OPx cancers treated with IMPT, and compare the dosimetry and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of ≥ grade 3 mucositis for IMPT and HT.

resultsTwenty two patients, 77% males, 41% elderly and 73% OC subsite, were reviewed. With comparable target coverage, IMPT significantly reduced the mean dose and D32, D39, D45, and D50, for both the oral mucosa (OM) and spared oral mucosa (sOM). With IMPT, there was a 7% absolute and 16.5% relative reduction in NTCP for grade 3 mucositis for OM, compared to HT. IMPT further reduced NTCP for sOM, and the benefit was maintained in OC, OPx subsites and elderly subgroup. Acute toxicities, grade III dermatitis and mucositis, were noted in 50% and 45.5% patients, respectively, while 22.7% patients had grade 3 dysphagia. Compared with published data, the hospital admission rate, median weight loss, feeding tube insertion, unplanned treatment gaps were lower with IMPT. At a median follow-up of 15 months, 81.8% were alive; 72.7%, alive without disease and 9%, alive with disease.

conclusionThe dosimetric benefit of IMPT translates into NTCP reduction for grade 3 mucositis compared to Helical Tomotherapy for OPx and OC cancers and encourages the use of IMPT in their management.

Indexed as

Mouth NeoplasmsMucositisOropharyngeal NeoplasmsProton TherapyRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedStomatitisAgedFemaleHumansMaleOrgans at RiskProbabilityRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedMucositisNTCPOral cavityOropharyngealProton

Identifiers

PMID37468950
PMCPMC10357709
OpenAlexW4384820380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.