Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37468875›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2023

A management perspective on resilience in healthcare: a framework and avenues for future research.

L Agostini, R Onofrio, C Piccolo, A Stefanini

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Towards Resilient Healthcare Systems: A Framework for Crisis Management.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

L AgostiniDepartment of Management and Engineering, University of Padova, Stradella San Nicola 3, Padua, Italy. lara.agostini@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1770-7470
R OnofrioDepartment of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico Di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, Milano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6190-261X
C PiccoloDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, C.So Umberto I, 40, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6074-9086
A StefaniniDepartment of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction Engineering, University of Pisa, Lungarno Antonio Pacinotti, 43, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1774-4236

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent major health shocks, such as the 2014-16 Ebola, the Zika outbreak, and, last but not least, the COVID-19 pandemic, have strongly contributed to drawing attention to the issue of resilience in the healthcare domain. Nevertheless, the scientific literature appears fragmented, creating difficulties in developing incremental research in this relevant managerial field.To fill this gap, this systematic literature review aims to provide a clear state of the art of the literature dealing with resilience in healthcare. Specifically, from the analysis of the theoretical articles and reviews, the key dimensions of resilience are identified, and a novel classification framework is proposed. The classification framework is then used to systematize extant empirical contributions. Two main dimensions of resilience are identified: the approach to resilience (reactive vs. proactive) and the type of crisis to deal with (acute shocks vs. chronic stressors). Four main streams of research are thus identified: (i) proactive approaches to acute shocks; (ii) proactive approaches to chronic stressors; (iii) reactive approaches to acute shocks; and (iv) reactive approaches to chronic stressors. These are scrutinised considering three additional dimensions: the level of analysis, the resources to nurture resilience, and the country context. The classification framework and the associated mapping contribute to systematising the fragmented literature on resilience in healthcare, providing a clear picture of the state of the art in this field and drawing a research agenda that opens interesting paths for future research.

Indexed as

COVID-19Zika VirusZika Virus InfectionDelivery of Health CareDisease OutbreaksHealth FacilitiesHumansPandemicsAgilityFlexibilityHealthcareLiterature reviewResilience

Identifiers

PMID37468875
PMCPMC10357696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.