Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37468769›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2023

Evaluation of a Radiation Oncology Microclerkship as a Component of Medical Student Education.

Shyamala Subramanian, Pranav Parikh, Joshua A Kra, Pierre D Maldjian, Susanne Walther, Sung Kim, Nicholas J DeNunzio, Matthew J Abrams, Steve E Braunstein, Jillian R Gunther and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. One-Day Radiation Oncology Course for Medical Students from Medical Schools Without Affiliated Radiotherapy Centers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shyamala SubramanianRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Pranav ParikhRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Joshua A KraDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey at University Hospital, Newark, NJ, USA.
Pierre D MaldjianDepartment of Radiology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Susanne WaltherDepartment of Medicine, University Hospital, Newark, NJ, USA.
Sung KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
Nicholas J DeNunzioDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
Matthew J AbramsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Steve E BraunsteinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jillian R GuntherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Malcolm D MattesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA. malcolm.mattes@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1151-896X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to most oncologic subspecialties, radiation oncology (RO) lacks a natural pathway for incorporation into the clinical clerkships, and few students ever complete a formal rotation in RO. The feasibility, and perceived value, of a 1-day "microclerkship" exposure in RO during other related clerkships was evaluated in this study. At a single institution, the RO clerkship director partnered with clerkship directors in medical oncology, palliative care, and radiology so that every 3rd or 4th year student would spend 1 day in RO during those clerkships. Afterwards, students completed an electronic survey containing multiple choice and 5-point Likert-type questions describing their experience. Descriptive statistics are reported. Ninety-seven students completed the RO microclerkship over 2 years, and 81 completed the survey (response rate 84%). Only 8 students (10%) had ever been in a RO department previously. During the microclerkship, 73 students (90%) saw at least one new patient consultation; 77 (95%) were involved in contouring or treatment planning; 76 (94%) saw treatment delivery; and 38 (47%) saw a brachytherapy procedure. Seventy-nine students (98%) felt that the microclerkship was at least moderately valuable (mean Likert-type rating 4.01, SD 0.73). Forty students (49%) were either somewhat or much more interested in participating in a longer (2-4 week) rotation in radiation oncology (mean Likert-type rating 3.59, SD 0.83). This study demonstrated the feasibility of incorporating a 1-day RO microclerkship into other related elective clerkships. Students viewed the experience favorably and found it valuable in their education.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipEducation, Medical, UndergraduateRadiation OncologyStudents, MedicalCurriculumEducational StatusHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesClerkshipOncology educationRadiation oncologyUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.