ArticleScientific reports2023
A framework for comparative study of databases and computational methods for arrhythmia detection from single-lead ECG.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges in the Classification of Cardiac Arrhythmias and Ischemia Using End-to-End Deep Learning and the Electrocardiogram: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Deep-Learning-Based Arrhythmia Detection Using ECG Signals: A Comparative Study and Performance Evaluation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arrhythmia detection from ECG is an important area of computational ECG analysis. However, although a large number of public ECG recordings are available, most research uses only few datasets, making it difficult to estimate the generalizability of the plethora of ECG classification methods. Furthermore, there is a large variability in the evaluation procedures, as well as lack of insight into whether they could successfully perform in a real-world setup. To address these problems, we propose an open-source, flexible and configurable ECG classification codebase-ECGDL, as one of the first efforts that includes 9 arrhythmia datasets, covering a large number of both morphological and rhythmic arrhythmias, as well as 4 deep neural networks, 4 segmentation techniques and 4 evaluation schemes. We perform a comparative analysis along these framework components to provide a comprehensive perspective into arrhythmia classification, focusing on single-lead ECG as the most recent trend in wireless ECG monitoring. ECGDL unifies the class information representation in datasets by creating a label dictionary. Furthermore, it includes a set of the best-performing deep learning approaches with varying signal segmentation techniques and network architectures. A novel evaluation scheme, inter-patient cross-validation, has also been proposed to perform fair evaluation and comparison of results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.