Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37468574›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A framework for comparative study of databases and computational methods for arrhythmia detection from single-lead ECG.

Elena Merdjanovska, Aleksandra Rashkovska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elena MerdjanovskaDepartment of Communication Systems, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Aleksandra RashkovskaDepartment of Communication Systems, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. aleksandra.rashkovska@ijs.si.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arrhythmia detection from ECG is an important area of computational ECG analysis. However, although a large number of public ECG recordings are available, most research uses only few datasets, making it difficult to estimate the generalizability of the plethora of ECG classification methods. Furthermore, there is a large variability in the evaluation procedures, as well as lack of insight into whether they could successfully perform in a real-world setup. To address these problems, we propose an open-source, flexible and configurable ECG classification codebase-ECGDL, as one of the first efforts that includes 9 arrhythmia datasets, covering a large number of both morphological and rhythmic arrhythmias, as well as 4 deep neural networks, 4 segmentation techniques and 4 evaluation schemes. We perform a comparative analysis along these framework components to provide a comprehensive perspective into arrhythmia classification, focusing on single-lead ECG as the most recent trend in wireless ECG monitoring. ECGDL unifies the class information representation in datasets by creating a label dictionary. Furthermore, it includes a set of the best-performing deep learning approaches with varying signal segmentation techniques and network architectures. A novel evaluation scheme, inter-patient cross-validation, has also been proposed to perform fair evaluation and comparison of results.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsArrhythmias, CardiacDatabases, FactualElectrocardiographyHumans

Identifiers

PMID37468574
PMCPMC10356811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.