Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37468448›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Do you want to promote recall, perceptions, or behavior? The best data visualization depends on the communication goal.

Jessica S Ancker, Natalie C Benda, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Using Separate Single-Outcome Risk Presentations Instead of Integrated Multioutcome Formats Improves Comprehension in Discrete Choice Experiments.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Building Public Health Data Dashboards: Tutorial Playbook.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How to Report Research on the Communication of Health-Related Numbers: The Research on Communicating Numbers (ReCoN) Guidelines.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Communicating cancer treatment with pictogram-based timeline visualizations.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Advancing the science of visualization of health data for lay audiences.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica S AnckerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3859-9130
Natalie C BendaSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3256-0243
Brian J Zikmund-FisherDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1637-4176
Columbia University · USUniversity of Michigan · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Making Numbers Meaningful: Promoting Evidence-based Communication of Numbers in HealthR01LM012964 · NLM · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI ANCKER, JESSICA S. · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data visualizations can be effective and inclusive means for helping people understand health-related data. Yet numerous high-quality studies comparing data visualizations have yielded relatively little practical design guidance because of a lack of clarity about what communicators want their audience to accomplish. When conducting rigorous evaluations of communication (eg, applying the ISO 9186 method), describing the process simply as evaluating "comprehension" or "interpretation" of visualizations fails to do justice to the true range of outcomes being studied. We present newly developed taxonomies of outcome measures and tasks that are guiding a large-scale systematic review of the health numbers communication literature. Using these taxonomies allows a designer to determine whether a specific data presentation format or feature supports or inhibits the desired audience cognitions, feelings, or behaviors. We argue that taking a granular, outcomes-based approach to designing and evaluating information visualization research is essential to deriving practical, actionable knowledge from it.

Indexed as

Data VisualizationHealth CommunicationCognitionCommunicationGoalsHumansOutcome Assessment, Health Caredata visualizationgoalshealth communicationhealth literacynumeracy

Identifiers

PMID37468448
PMCPMC10797268
OpenAlexW4384704801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.