Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37468062›Full record

ArticleAcademic pediatrics

Specialties Providing Ambulatory Care and Associated Health Care Utilization and Quality for Children With Medical Complexity.

Andrea M Austin, Andrew P Schaefer, Mary Arakelyan, Seneca D Freyleue, David C Goodman, JoAnna K Leyenaar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Rural-urban disparities in primary care and geographic continuity of care for children with medical complexity.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea M AustinThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (AM Austin, AP Schaefer, SD Freyleue, D Goodman, and JK Leyenaar), Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
Andrew P SchaeferThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (AM Austin, AP Schaefer, SD Freyleue, D Goodman, and JK Leyenaar), Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
Mary ArakelyanDepartment of Pediatrics (M Arakelyan and JK Leyenaar), Dartmouth Health Children's, Lebanon, NH.
Seneca D FreyleueThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (AM Austin, AP Schaefer, SD Freyleue, D Goodman, and JK Leyenaar), Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
David C GoodmanThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (AM Austin, AP Schaefer, SD Freyleue, D Goodman, and JK Leyenaar), Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
JoAnna K LeyenaarThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (AM Austin, AP Schaefer, SD Freyleue, D Goodman, and JK Leyenaar), Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; Department of Pediatrics (M Arakelyan and JK Leyenaar), Dartmouth Health Children's, Lebanon, NH. Electronic address: joanna.k.leyenaar@hitchcock.org.

Funding

Urban-Rural Disparities in Healthcare Quality for Children with Complex or Disabling Health ConditionsR01MD014735 · NIMHD · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI LEYENAAR, JOANNA · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD014735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough children with medical complexity (CMC) have substantial health care needs, the extent to which they receive ambulatory care from primary care versus specialist clinicians is unknown. We aimed to determine the predominant specialty providing ambulatory care to CMC (primary care or specialty discipline), the extent to which specialists deliver well-child care, and associations between having a specialty predominant provider and health care utilization and quality.

methodsIn a retrospective cohort analysis of 2012-17 all-payer claims data from Colorado, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts, we identified the predominant specialty providing ambulatory care for CMC <18 years. Propensity score weighting was used to create a balanced sample of CMC and assess differences in outcomes, including adequate well-child care, continuity of care, emergency visits, and hospitalizations, between CMC with a primary care versus specialty predominant provider.

resultsAmong 67,218 CMC, 75.3% (n = 50,584) received the plurality of care from a primary care discipline. Body system involvement, age > 2 years, urban residence, and cooccurring disabilities were associated with predominantly receiving care from specialists. After propensity score weighting, there were no significant differences between CMC with a primary care or specialist "predominant specialty seen" (PSS) in ambulatory visit counts, adequate well-child care, hospitalizations, or overall continuity of care. Specialists were the sole providers of well-child care and vaccines for 49.9% and 53.1% of CMC with a specialist PSS.

conclusionsMost CMC received the plurality of care from primary care disciplines, and there were no substantial differences in overall utilization or quality based on the PSS.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareHospitalizationChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareRetrospective Studieschildren with medical complexityhealth services researchmedical home

Identifiers

PMID37468062
PMCPMC10792122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.