Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37468037›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2023

Clinically Indicated Genomic Sequencing of Children in Foster Care: Legal and Ethical Issues.

Hadley Stevens Smith, Emily S Bonkowski, Madison R Hickingbotham, Stacey Pereira, Thomas May, Christi J Guerrini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hadley Stevens SmithDepartment of Population Medicine, Precision Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA. Electronic address: hadley.smith@hphci.harvard.edu.
Emily S BonkowskiSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; University of Washington Institute for Public Health Genetics, Seattle, WA.
Madison R HickingbothamDepartment of Population Medicine, Precision Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA.
Stacey PereiraCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Thomas MayDepartment of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.
Christi J GuerriniCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

Funding

Heterogeneity of preferences for and outcomes of pediatric genomic sequencing by race and ethnicityR00HG011491 · NHGRI · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI SMITH, HADLEY STEVENS · 2023 to 2025
$814k
An ELSI-Integrated Evaluation of the Family-Level Utility of Pediatric Genomic SequencingK99HG011491 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SMITH, HADLEY STEVENS · 2021 to 2022
$164k
NHGRI NIH HHS K99 HG011491NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG011491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are approximately 400 000 children in foster care in the US, approximately one-half of whom have chronic health problems and approximately 10% of whom have complex healthcare needs. Given the increasing relevance of genomic sequencing to guide clinical care for children with rare, chronic, and undiagnosed conditions, it may be an important component of diagnostic evaluation for children in foster care. Clinically indicated genomic sequencing may provide information that has health implications for children in foster care, as well as for their biological parents and other relatives. Whether and how genomic sequencing results impact legal decision making and family court outcomes is not yet well-understood. We describe scenarios that highlight legal, ethical, and policy issues surrounding genomic sequencing for children in foster care using 3 cases adapted from real-world events. Together, these cases highlight important yet underexplored issues that arise when genomic information has legal relevance in family court and ethical implications for child and family well-being. As genomic sequencing becomes more routine for the general pediatric population, additional research is needed to better understand its impacts on children and other stakeholders within the foster care system.

Indexed as

Foster Home CareParentsChildGenomicsHumansadoptionELSIethicsfoster caregenomic sequencinglaw

Identifiers

PMID37468037
PMCPMC10792112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.