Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37468020›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2023

Evaluation of a compact 3 T MRI scanner for patients with implanted devices.

Lydia J Bardwell Speltz, Yunhong Shu, Robert E Watson, Joshua D Trzasko, Myung-Ho In, Erin M Gray, Maria A Halverson, Matthew R Tarasek, Yihe Hua, John Huston and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. [Spherical measurement-based analysis of gradient nonlinearity in magnetic resonance imaging].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lydia J Bardwell SpeltzDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States; Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Yunhong ShuDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Robert E WatsonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Joshua D TrzaskoDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Myung-Ho InDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Erin M GrayDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Maria A HalversonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Matthew R TarasekGE Research, Niskayuna, NY, United States.
Yihe HuaGE Research, Niskayuna, NY, United States.
John HustonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Petrice M CogswellDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Thomas K F FooGE Research, Niskayuna, NY, United States.
Matt A BernsteinDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States. Electronic address: mBernstein@mayo.edu.

Funding

High-performance compact 3T MRI: Technical optimization for advanced brain imagingU01EB024450 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BERNSTEIN, MATTHEW A., FOO, THOMAS K · 2017 to 2021
$5.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB024450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to high-quality MR exams is severely limited for patients with some implanted devices due to labeled MR safety conditions, but small-bore systems can overcome this limitation. For example, a compact 3 T MR scanner (C3T) with high-performance gradients can acquire exams of the head, extremities, and infants. Because of its reduced bore size and the patient being advanced only partially into the bore, the associated electromagnetic (EM) fields drop off rapidly caudal to the head, compared to whole-body systems. Therefore, some patients with MR conditional implanted devices can safely receive 3 T brain exams on the C3T using its strong gradients and a multiple-channel receive coil, while a corresponding exam on whole-body MR is precluded. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of a small-bore scanner for subjects with MR conditional spinal or sacral nerve stimulators, or abandoned cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) leads. The spatial dependence of specific absorption rate (SAR) on the C3T was compared to whole-body scanners. A device assessment tool was developed and applied to evaluate MR safety individually on the C3T for 12 subjects with implanted devices or abandoned CIED leads. Once MR safety was established, the subjects received a C3T brain exam along with their clinical, 1.5 T exam. The resulting images were graded by three board-certified neuroradiologists. The C3T exams were well-tolerated with no adverse events, and significantly outperformed the whole-body 1.5 T exams in terms of overall image quality.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstheses and ImplantsBrainHeadHeartHumansAbandoned leadCompact 3TImplanted deviceMR safetySacral stimulatorSpinal stimulator

Identifiers

PMID37468020
PMCPMC10528046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.