Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37467632›Full record

ReviewDNA repair2023

Live cell single-molecule imaging to study DNA repair in human cells.

Joshua R Heyza, Mariia Mikhova, Jens C Schmidt

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA repair, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Volumetric Single-Molecule Tracking Inside Subcellular Structures.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua R HeyzaInstitute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Mariia MikhovaInstitute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Jens C SchmidtInstitute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. Electronic address: schmi706@msu.edu.
Michigan State University · US

Funding

Single-molecule Analysis of the DNA Damage Response in Living CellsDP2GM142307 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHMIDT, JENS CHRISTOPHER · 2020 to 2020
$2.1M
Defining the mechanism of Shieldin complex in DNA end joiningF32GM139292 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HEYZA, JOSHUA · 2020 to 2022
$201k
NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM142307NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM139292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic material in human cells is continuously exposed to a wide variety of insults that can induce different DNA lesions. To maintain genomic stability and prevent potentially deleterious genetic changes caused by DNA damage, mammalian cells have evolved a number of pathways that repair specific types of DNA damage. These DNA repair pathways vary in their accuracy, some providing high-fidelity repair while others are error-prone and are only activated as a last resort. Adding additional complexity to cellular mechanisms of DNA repair is the DNA damage response which is a sophisticated a signaling network that coordinates repair outcomes, cell-cycle checkpoint activation, and cell fate decisions. As a result of the sheer complexity of the various DNA repair pathways and the DNA damage response there are large gaps in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying DNA damage repair in human cells. A key unaddressed question is how the dynamic recruitment of DNA repair factors contributes to repair kinetics and repair pathway choice in human cells. Methodological advances in live cell single-molecule imaging over the last decade now allow researchers to directly observe and analyze the dynamics of DNA repair proteins in living cells with high spatiotemporal resolution. Live cell single-molecule imaging combined with single-particle tracking can provide direct insight into the biochemical reactions that control DNA repair and has the power to identify previously unobservable processes in living cells. This review summarizes the main considerations for experimental design and execution for live cell single-molecule imaging experiments and describes how they can be used to define the molecular mechanisms of DNA damage repair in mammalian cells.

Indexed as

DNA RepairSingle Molecule ImagingDNADNA DamageHumansSignal TransductionDNADNA RepairHaloTagLive cell single-molecule imaging

Identifiers

PMID37467632
PMCPMC10530516
OpenAlexW4384007235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.