Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37467496›Full record

ReviewBlood2024

Escape from T-cell-targeting immunotherapies in acute myeloid leukemia.

Jayakumar Vadakekolathu, Sergio Rutella

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. TIM-3 in AML: pathogenic roles and therapeutic targetability.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. HSCs/MPPs as cells of origin with altered differentiation hierarchy impairing immunomicroenvironment inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. HERV-K TM Subunit Elicits CD8Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jayakumar VadakekolathuJohn van Geest Cancer Research Centre, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2671-4285
Sergio RutellaJohn van Geest Cancer Research Centre, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1970-7375
Nottingham Trent University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractSingle-cell and spatial multimodal technologies have propelled discoveries of the solid tumor microenvironment (TME) molecular features and their correlation with clinical response and resistance to immunotherapy. Computational tools are incessantly being developed to characterize tumor-infiltrating immune cells and to model tumor immune escape. These advances have led to substantial research into T-cell hypofunctional states in the TME and their reinvigoration with T-cell-targeting approaches, including checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Until recently, we lacked a high-dimensional picture of the acute myeloid leukemia (AML) TME, including compositional and functional differences in immune cells between disease onset and postchemotherapy or posttransplantation relapse, and the dynamic interplay between immune cells and AML blasts at various maturation stages. AML subgroups with heightened interferon gamma (IFN-γ) signaling were shown to derive clinical benefit from CD123×CD3-bispecific dual-affinity retargeting molecules and CPIs, while being less likely to respond to standard-of-care cytotoxic chemotherapy. In this review, we first highlight recent progress into deciphering immune effector states in AML (including T-cell exhaustion and senescence), oncogenic signaling mechanisms that could reduce the susceptibility of AML cells to T-cell-mediated killing, and the dichotomous roles of type I and II IFN in antitumor immunity. In the second part, we discuss how this knowledge could be translated into opportunities to manipulate the AML TME with the aim to overcome resistance to CPIs and other T-cell immunotherapies, building on recent success stories in the solid tumor field, and we provide an outlook for the future.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteT-LymphocytesTumor EscapeTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID37467496
PMCPMC11251208
OpenAlexW4384820560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.