Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37467481›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2023

Temporal Interactions Between Social Motivation and Behavior In Daily Life Among Individuals at Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis.

Gregory P Strauss, Ian M Raugh, Lauren Luther, Elaine F Walker, Vijay A Mittal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Social Effort Discounting Reveals Domain-General and Social-Specific Motivation Components.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gregory P StraussDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Ian M RaughDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4981-2395
Lauren LutherDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Elaine F WalkerDepartment of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9798-8101
Vijay A MittalDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9017-5119

Funding

Prodromal Inventory for Negative Symptoms (PINS): A Development and Validation StudyR01MH116039 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI MITTAL, VIJAY A, STRAUSS, GREGORY P · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
Mechanisms Underlying Emotion Regulation Abnormalities in Youth at Clinical High-Risk for PsychosisR21MH119438 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI STRAUSS, GREGORY P · 2019 to 2020
$415k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116039NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH119438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and hypothesesPoor social functioning is common among individuals at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis and is associated with greater likelihood of conversion. Unfortunately, processes contributing to social impairment are unclear, making social functioning difficult to improve via treatment. The current study examined whether abnormalities in social functioning result from aberrant temporal interactions between social motivation and behavior. STUDY

designParticipants included 105 individuals at CHR and 62 healthy controls (CN) who completed 6 days of ecological momentary assessment. Multilevel models examined time-lagged interactions between social behavior and motivation. STUDY

resultsCHR and CN did not differ in social motivation; however, CHR were less likely to interact with family and coworkers and more likely to engage in interactions via phone and text/social media. Autocorrelations indicated that social behavior and motivation were generally consistent across time in CHR and CN groups. Time-lagged analyses indicated that both groups had an increase in social motivation across time when they were alone and a decrease in social motivation across time when they were with others. However, the relative decrease when with others and increase when alone were less robust in CHR than CN, particularly for in-person interactions. Social motivation at time t did not differentially impact social partner or modality at time t+1 in the groups.

conclusionsFindings suggest that social behavior and motivation have different temporal interactions in CHR and CN. Psychosocial interventions may benefit from targeting the frequency of social behavior with specific partners and modalities to change social motivation.

Indexed as

MotivationPsychotic DisordersHumansProbabilityProdromal SymptomsSocial AdjustmentSocial Behaviordigital phenotypingexperience samplingUltra high-risk

Identifiers

PMID37467481
PMCPMC10483454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.