Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37467479›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2023

SCN1A-deficient excitatory neuronal networks display mutation-specific phenotypes.

Eline J H van Hugte, Elly I Lewerissa, Ka Man Wu, Nicky Scheefhals, Giulia Parodi, Torben W van Voorst, Sofia Puvogel, Naoki Kogo, Jason M Keller, Monica Frega and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Loss of function of the chromatin remodeling geneProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Eline J H van HugteDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboudumc, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7626-2424
Elly I LewerissaDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboudumc, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ka Man WuDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboudumc, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nicky ScheefhalsDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboudumc, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Giulia ParodiDepartment of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics, and Systems Engineering (DIBRIS), University of Genova, 16145 GE Genova, Italy.
Torben W van VoorstDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboudumc, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sofia PuvogelDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboudumc, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Naoki KogoDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboudumc, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jason M KellerDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboudumc, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Monica FregaDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboudumc, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dirk SchubertDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Helenius J SchelhaasDepartment of Neurology, Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), 2103 SW Heemstede, The Netherlands.
Judith VerhoevenDepartment of Epileptology, ACE Kempenhaeghe, 5591 VE Heeze, The Netherlands.
Marian MajoieDepartment of Epileptology, ACE Kempenhaeghe, 5591 VE Heeze, The Netherlands.
Hans van BokhovenDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboudumc, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nael Nadif KasriDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboudumc, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7448-9289
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLKempenhaeghe · NLStichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland · NLUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

Dutch epilepsiefonds WAR 18-02European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases JTC2020-SCN1A-up!SFARI 890042the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development 91217055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dravet syndrome is a severe epileptic encephalopathy, characterized by (febrile) seizures, behavioural problems and developmental delay. Eighty per cent of patients with Dravet syndrome have a mutation in SCN1A, encoding Nav1.1. Milder clinical phenotypes, such as GEFS+ (generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus), can also arise from SCN1A mutations. Predicting the clinical phenotypic outcome based on the type of mutation remains challenging, even when the same mutation is inherited within one family. This clinical and genetic heterogeneity adds to the difficulties of predicting disease progression and tailoring the prescription of anti-seizure medication. Understanding the neuropathology of different SCN1A mutations may help to predict the expected clinical phenotypes and inform the selection of best-fit treatments. Initially, the loss of Na+-current in inhibitory neurons was recognized specifically to result in disinhibition and consequently seizure generation. However, the extent to which excitatory neurons contribute to the pathophysiology is currently debated and might depend on the patient clinical phenotype or the specific SCN1A mutation. To examine the genotype-phenotype correlations of SCN1A mutations in relation to excitatory neurons, we investigated a panel of patient-derived excitatory neuronal networks differentiated on multi-electrode arrays. We included patients with different clinical phenotypes, harbouring various SCN1A mutations, along with a family in which the same mutation led to febrile seizures, GEFS+ or Dravet syndrome. We hitherto describe a previously unidentified functional excitatory neuronal network phenotype in the context of epilepsy, which corresponds to seizurogenic network prediction patterns elicited by proconvulsive compounds. We found that excitatory neuronal networks were affected differently, depending on the type of SCN1A mutation, but did not segregate according to clinical severity. Specifically, loss-of-function mutations could be distinguished from missense mutations, and mutations in the pore domain could be distinguished from mutations in the voltage sensing domain. Furthermore, all patients showed aggravated neuronal network responses at febrile temperatures compared with controls. Finally, retrospective drug screening revealed that anti-seizure medication affected GEFS+ patient- but not Dravet patient-derived neuronal networks in a patient-specific and clinically relevant manner. In conclusion, our results indicate a mutation-specific excitatory neuronal network phenotype, which recapitulates the foremost clinically relevant features, providing future opportunities for precision therapies.

Indexed as

Epilepsies, MyoclonicEpilepsy, GeneralizedSeizures, FebrileHumansMutationNAV1.1 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelNeuronsPhenotypeRetrospective StudiesNAV1.1 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelSCN1A protein, humanDravet syndromeepilepsyhiPSCMEA

Identifiers

PMID37467479
PMCPMC10689919
OpenAlexW4384819198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.