ArticleJournal of proteome research2023
Statistical Detection of Differentially Abundant Proteins in Experiments with Repeated Measures Designs and Isobaric Labeling.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A phase 2A/B randomized trial of metabolic modulators intranasal insulin and empagliflozin for MCI and early AD.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Trial
- Impact of bed roughness configurations on flow dynamics and hydraulic resistance in open-channel flows.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- In Vitro Digestion and Gut Microbiota Fermentation of the Anticancer Marine Drug BG136: Stability and Biotransformation Investigation.Marine drugs · 2025Article
- Integrating -Omic Technologies across Modality, Space, and Time to Decipher Remodeling in Cardiac Disease.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Relative quantification of proteins and post-translational modifications in proteomic experiments with shared peptides: a weight-based approach.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Primate cerebrospinal fluid CHI3L1 reflects brain TREM2 agonism.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- What's new in single-cell proteomics.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2024Review
- Unraveling Posttranslational Modification Complexity: Advances in Quantitative Histone Proteoform Mass Spectrometry.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Repeated measures experimental designs, which quantify proteins in biological subjects repeatedly over multiple experimental conditions or times, are commonly used in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Such designs distinguish the biological variation within and between the subjects and increase the statistical power of detecting within-subject changes in protein abundance. Meanwhile, proteomics experiments increasingly incorporate tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling, a multiplexing strategy that gains both relative protein quantification accuracy and sample throughput. However, combining repeated measures and TMT multiplexing in a large-scale investigation presents statistical challenges due to unique interplays of between-mixture, within-mixture, between-subject, and within-subject variation. This manuscript proposes a family of linear mixed-effects models for differential analysis of proteomics experiments with repeated measures and TMT multiplexing. These models decompose the variation in the data into the contributions from its sources as appropriate for the specifics of each experiment, enable statistical inference of differential protein abundance, and recognize a difference in the uncertainty of between-subject versus within-subject comparisons. The proposed family of models is implemented in the R/Bioconductor package MSstatsTMT v2.2.0. Evaluations of four simulated datasets and four investigations answering diverse biological questions demonstrated the value of this approach as compared to the existing general-purpose approaches and implementations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.