Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37467362›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2023

Statistical Detection of Differentially Abundant Proteins in Experiments with Repeated Measures Designs and Isobaric Labeling.

Ting Huang, Mateusz Staniak, Felipe da Veiga Leprevost, Amanda M Figueroa-Navedo, Alexander R Ivanov, Alexey I Nesvizhskii, Meena Choi, Olga Vitek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A phase 2A/B randomized trial of metabolic modulators intranasal insulin and empagliflozin for MCI and early AD.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Primate cerebrospinal fluid CHI3L1 reflects brain TREM2 agonism.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  7. What's new in single-cell proteomics.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ting HuangKhoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1041-2167
Mateusz StaniakInstitute of Mathematics, University of Wrocław, Wrocław 50-384, Poland.
Felipe da Veiga LeprevostDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Amanda M Figueroa-NavedoDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Barnett Institute of Biological and Chemical Analysis, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Alexander R IvanovDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Barnett Institute of Biological and Chemical Analysis, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4691-8488
Alexey I NesvizhskiiDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Meena ChoiDepartments of Microchemistry, Proteomics & Lipidomics, Genentech, South San Francisco, California 94080, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6025-5035
Olga VitekKhoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1728-1104

Funding

COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY-BASED INTERACTOME DATAR01GM094231 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Alexey I Nesvizhskii · 2010 to 2026
$5.4M
Effect of methodological and biological variability on molecular profiling of extracellular vesicles in cancer detectionR01CA218500 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI DEL MONTE, FEDERICA, GHIRAN, IONITA CALIN · 2018 to 2022
$4.0M
Robust ultra-high sensitivity proteomic technologies for limited samplesR35GM136421 · NIGMS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI Alexander R. Ivanov · 2020 to 2026
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218500NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094231NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repeated measures experimental designs, which quantify proteins in biological subjects repeatedly over multiple experimental conditions or times, are commonly used in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Such designs distinguish the biological variation within and between the subjects and increase the statistical power of detecting within-subject changes in protein abundance. Meanwhile, proteomics experiments increasingly incorporate tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling, a multiplexing strategy that gains both relative protein quantification accuracy and sample throughput. However, combining repeated measures and TMT multiplexing in a large-scale investigation presents statistical challenges due to unique interplays of between-mixture, within-mixture, between-subject, and within-subject variation. This manuscript proposes a family of linear mixed-effects models for differential analysis of proteomics experiments with repeated measures and TMT multiplexing. These models decompose the variation in the data into the contributions from its sources as appropriate for the specifics of each experiment, enable statistical inference of differential protein abundance, and recognize a difference in the uncertainty of between-subject versus within-subject comparisons. The proposed family of models is implemented in the R/Bioconductor package MSstatsTMT v2.2.0. Evaluations of four simulated datasets and four investigations answering diverse biological questions demonstrated the value of this approach as compared to the existing general-purpose approaches and implementations.

Indexed as

Research DesignTandem Mass SpectrometryHumansProteomeProteomedifferential analysisLC-MS/MSproteomicsrepeated measures designsTMT labeling

Identifiers

PMID37467362
PMCPMC11090052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.