ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2023
Changes in methylation-based aging in women who do and do not develop breast cancer.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liver-specific phenotypic aging, behavior and genetic risks, and long-term liver-related outcomes.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Article
- "I had to work it out for myself": opportunities for primary care to fill a void for early-onset breast cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Mammo-AGE: deep learning estimation of breast age from mammograms.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The B-SCancers · 2025Article
- Lymphoma accelerates T cell and tissue aging.Cancer cell · 2025Article
- Methylation-based biological age and cardiotoxicity risk in breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Pubertal timing as a predictor of epigenetic aging and mortality risk in young adulthood.Developmental psychology · 2025Article
- Breast cancer-specific survival by molecular subtype in different age groups of women in Scotland.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- The hidden pathway: biological aging as a mediator between diabetes and breast cancer risk: a Mendelian randomized study.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Accelerated aging associated with cancer characteristics and treatments among breast cancer survivors.Aging · 2025Article
- Chemotherapy-induced acceleration of DNA methylation-based biological age in breast cancer.Epigenetics · 2024Article
- Current evidence supporting associations of DNA methylation measurements with survivorship burdens in cancer survivors: A scoping review.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- A data-driven approach to improve wellness and reduce recurrence in cancer survivors.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer survivors have increased incidence of age-related diseases, suggesting that some survivors may experience faster biological aging.
methodsAmong 417 women enrolled in the prospective Sister Study cohort, DNA methylation data were generated on paired blood samples collected an average of 7.7 years apart and used to calculate 3 epigenetic metrics of biological aging (PhenoAgeAccel, GrimAgeAccel, and Dunedin Pace of Aging Calculated from the Epigenome [DunedinPACE]). Approximately half (n = 190) the women sampled were diagnosed and treated for breast cancer between blood draws, whereas the other half (n = 227) remained breast cancer-free. Breast tumor characteristics and treatment information were abstracted from medical records.
resultsAmong women who developed breast cancer, diagnoses occurred an average of 3.5 years after the initial blood draw and 4 years before the second draw. After accounting for covariates and biological aging metrics measured at baseline, women diagnosed and treated for breast cancer had higher biological aging at the second blood draw than women who remained cancer-free as measured by PhenoAgeAccel (standardized mean difference [β] = 0.13, 95% confidence interval [CI) = 0.00 to 0.26), GrimAgeAccel (β = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.25), and DunedinPACE (β = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.50). In case-only analyses assessing associations with different breast cancer therapies, radiation had strong positive associations with biological aging (PhenoAgeAccel: β = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.19 to 0.59; GrimAgeAccel: β = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.47; DunedinPACE: β = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.48).
conclusionsBiological aging is accelerated following a breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. Breast cancer treatment modalities appear to differentially contribute to biological aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.