SynthesisBlood advances2023
Infections following bispecific antibodies in myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
79 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Infection risk associated with talquetamab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic review with meta-analysis of talquetamab monotherapy and descriptive analysis of combination therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Rethinking secondary immunodeficiency: a cross-domain pathway framework for risk stratification.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Cytomegalovirus infection in patients receiving bispecific antibodies for multiple myeloma and B-cell malignancies: a single-center cohort and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative infection risk in CAR T vs bispecific antibodies in B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood advances · 2025Pooled it
- To substitute or not? A systematic review of immunoglobulin replacement therapy in multiple myeloma patients treated with bispecific antibodies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Dual-target immunotherapies in NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of Bispecific Antibodies in Adults with Large B-Cell Lymphomas: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trial Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Infections in patients with lymphoma treated with bispecific antibodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood advances · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Belantamab mafodotin, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: part 1 results of a phase I/II study.Haematologica · 2024Trial
- Estimating the Healthcare Cost of Infection-Related Hospitalisations in Multiple Myeloma.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- GPRC5D-targeting bispecific and trispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma: Current evidence and emerging strategies.Cancer · 2026Review
- Ciltacabtagene autoleucel heralds the arrival of fixed-duration therapies in myeloma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Bispecific Antibodies Are Associated With Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- Elranatamab in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Multicenter Real-World Study from Türkiye.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Infection in Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Bispecific Antibodies.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Cytomegalovirus reactivation in patients with multiple myeloma receiving bispecific antibodies.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Navigating the Therapeutic Landscape of Multiple Myeloma: Immunotherapy, Microenvironment, and Resistance.Biomedicines · 2026Review
19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bispecific antibodies, a novel immunotherapy with promising efficacy against multiple myeloma, form immune synapses between T-cell surface marker CD3 and malignant cell markers, including B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), FcRH5, and G protein-coupled receptor GPRC5D. These bispecific antibodies so effectively deplete plasma cells (and to some extent T-cells) that patients are at increased risk of developing infections. A systematic review and meta-analysis of infections in published studies of patients with myeloma treated with bispecific antibodies was conducted to better characterize the infection risks. A literature search used MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane to identify relevant studies between inception and February 10, 2023, including major conference presentations. Phase 1b-3 clinical trials and observational studies were included. Sixteen clinical trials comprising 1666 patients were included. Median follow-up was 7.6 months and 38% of the cohort had penta-drug refractory disease. Pooled prevalence of all-grade infections was 56%, whereas the prevalence of grade ≥3 infections was 24%. Patients who were treated with BCMA-targeted bispecifics had significantly higher rates of grade ≥3 infections than non-BCMA bispecifics (25% vs 20%). Similarly, patients treated with bispecifics in combination with other agents had significantly higher rate of all-grade infection than those receiving monotherapy (71% vs 52%). In observational studies (n = 293), excluded from the primary analysis to ensure no overlap with patients in clinical trials, several infections classically associated with T-cell depletion were identified. This systematic review identifies BCMA-targeted bispecifics and bispecific combination therapy as having higher infection risk, requiring vigilant infection screening and prophylaxis strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.