Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37467036›Full record

SynthesisBlood advances2023

Infections following bispecific antibodies in myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gemma Reynolds, Edward R Scheffer Cliff, Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin, Rakesh Popat, Shonali Midha, Melissa Ng Liet Hing, Simon J Harrison, Aaron S Kesselheim, Benjamin W Teh

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gemma ReynoldsNational Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9561-3592
Edward R Scheffer CliffProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-5977-907X
Ghulam Rehman MohyuddinDivision of Hematology and Hematological Malignancies, Huntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0001-6464-783X
Rakesh PopatNIHR UCLH Clinical Research Facility, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Shonali MidhaDivision of Myeloma, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Melissa Ng Liet HingDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Simon J HarrisonDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4555-6582
Aaron S KesselheimProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-8867-2666
Benjamin W TehNational Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0213-5470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bispecific antibodies, a novel immunotherapy with promising efficacy against multiple myeloma, form immune synapses between T-cell surface marker CD3 and malignant cell markers, including B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), FcRH5, and G protein-coupled receptor GPRC5D. These bispecific antibodies so effectively deplete plasma cells (and to some extent T-cells) that patients are at increased risk of developing infections. A systematic review and meta-analysis of infections in published studies of patients with myeloma treated with bispecific antibodies was conducted to better characterize the infection risks. A literature search used MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane to identify relevant studies between inception and February 10, 2023, including major conference presentations. Phase 1b-3 clinical trials and observational studies were included. Sixteen clinical trials comprising 1666 patients were included. Median follow-up was 7.6 months and 38% of the cohort had penta-drug refractory disease. Pooled prevalence of all-grade infections was 56%, whereas the prevalence of grade ≥3 infections was 24%. Patients who were treated with BCMA-targeted bispecifics had significantly higher rates of grade ≥3 infections than non-BCMA bispecifics (25% vs 20%). Similarly, patients treated with bispecifics in combination with other agents had significantly higher rate of all-grade infection than those receiving monotherapy (71% vs 52%). In observational studies (n = 293), excluded from the primary analysis to ensure no overlap with patients in clinical trials, several infections classically associated with T-cell depletion were identified. This systematic review identifies BCMA-targeted bispecifics and bispecific combination therapy as having higher infection risk, requiring vigilant infection screening and prophylaxis strategies.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificMultiple MyelomaB-Cell Maturation AntigenCD3 ComplexHumansImmunotherapyT-LymphocytesAntibodies, BispecificB-Cell Maturation AntigenCD3 Complex

Identifiers

PMID37467036
PMCPMC10558589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.