Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37466904›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2023

Neurocognitive effects of androgen deprivation therapy and new hormonal agents in a sample of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Andreas Ihrig, Pascal Marino Pernt, Stefanie Zschäbitz, Johannes Huber, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Till J Bugaj, Imad Maatouk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mapping Cognitive Oncology: A Decade of Trends and Research Fronts.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment and kidney dysfunction.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andreas IhrigDivision of Psycho-Oncology, Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. andreas.ihrig@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8497-9193
Pascal Marino PerntDivision of Psycho-Oncology, Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefanie ZschäbitzDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Centre for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Johannes HuberDepartment of Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-8958
Hans-Christoph FriederichDivision of Psycho-Oncology, Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4344-8959
Till J BugajDivision of Psycho-Oncology, Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8287-2635
Imad MaatoukDivision of Psycho-Oncology, Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8030-1182

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough the growing treatment landscape for metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) has revealed new opportunities, it has also provided challenges, such as undesirable side effects. The aim of the present study was to provide further data on domain-specific cognitive impairments in mPC patients with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and new hormonal agents.

methodsFifty-eight patients (71 ± 8 years) with mPC were investigated using a cross-sectional design. All patients had received some form of ADT (93% had received luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogs/antagonists), 66% had received chemotherapy, and 84% had received anti-resorptive therapy. We evaluated learning and memory, processing speed, and executive functions, as recommended by the International Cognition and Cancer Task Force, to determine neurocognitive deficits.

resultsPatients treated with ADT scored significantly lower on all neurocognitive tests and showed significantly more neurocognitive deficits (38-62%) than age-adjusted reference samples (16%, p < 0.05). Cognitive deficits were mild in most cases and predominantly affected visuomotor processing speed (48%). Moderate and severe deficits were found in 11% and 5% of patients, respectively, with word fluency as the predominant deficit (23%). No associations were found between the type or duration of treatment and the severity of cognitive deficits.

conclusionsTreatment of mPC with ADT is correlated with neurocognitive deficits in several cognitive domains. Language skills and processing speed were most frequently impaired. However, a consistent pattern of cognitive impairment was not identified. Neurocognitive deficits should be considered in phase III and IV trials.

trial registrationThe study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00017727).

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalCognitive DysfunctionProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisAndrogen AntagonistsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneAndrogen deprivation therapyHormonal agentsMetastatic prostate cancerNeurocognitive effects

Identifiers

PMID37466904
PMCPMC10560187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.