Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37466866›Full record

ReviewSports medicine - open2023

In Vivo Strain Patterns in the Achilles Tendon During Dynamic Activities: A Comprehensive Survey of the Literature.

Naomi C Adam, Colin R Smith, Walter Herzog, Andrew A Amis, Adamantios Arampatzis, William R Taylor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine - open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [A comparative study of dynamic versus static rehabilitation protocols after acute Achilles tendon rupture repair with channel assisted minimally invasive repair technique].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in physiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Naomi C AdamInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zürich, Leopold-Ruzicka-Weg 4, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
Colin R SmithInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zürich, Leopold-Ruzicka-Weg 4, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
Walter HerzogHuman Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Andrew A AmisDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Adamantios ArampatzisDepartment of Training and Movement Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin School of Movement Science, Berlin, Germany.
William R TaylorInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zürich, Leopold-Ruzicka-Weg 4, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland. bt@ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4060-4098

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 182241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achilles' tendon (AT) injuries such as ruptures and tendinopathies have experienced a dramatic rise in the mid- to older-aged population. Given that the AT plays a key role at all stages of locomotion, unsuccessful rehabilitation after injury often leads to long-term, deleterious health consequences. Understanding healthy in vivo strains as well as the complex muscle-tendon unit interactions will improve access to the underlying aetiology of injuries and how their functionality can be effectively restored post-injury. The goals of this survey of the literature with a systematic search were to provide a benchmark of healthy AT strains measured in vivo during functional activities and identify the sources of variability observed in the results. Two databases were searched, and all articles that provided measured in vivo peak strains or the change in strain with respect to time were included. In total, 107 articles that reported subjects over the age of 18 years with no prior AT injury and measured while performing functional activities such as voluntary contractions, walking, running, jumping, or jump landing were included in this review. In general, unclear anatomical definitions of the sub-tendon and aponeurosis structures have led to considerable confusion in the literature. MRI, ultrasound, and motion capture were the predominant approaches, sometimes coupled with modelling. The measured peak strains increased from 4% to over 10% from contractions, to walking, running, and jumping, in that order. Importantly, measured AT strains were heavily dependent on measurement location, measurement method, measurement protocol, individual AT geometry, and mechanical properties, as well as instantaneous kinematics and kinetics of the studied activity. Through a comprehensive review of approaches and results, this survey of the literature therefore converges to a united terminology of the structures and their common underlying characteristics and presents the state-of-knowledge on their functional strain patterns.

Indexed as

Achilles tendonAponeurosisDynamic activitiesIn vivo measurementSub-tendonTendon strain

Identifiers

PMID37466866
PMCPMC10356630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.