Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37466809›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2023

Robust and Adaptive Two-stage Designs in Nonlinear Mixed Effect Models.

Lucie Fayette, Romain Leroux, France Mentré, Jérémy Seurat

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucie FayetteInserm, IAME, Université Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, F-75018, Paris, France.
Romain LerouxInserm, IAME, Université Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, F-75018, Paris, France.
France MentréInserm, IAME, Université Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, F-75018, Paris, France.
Jérémy SeuratInserm, IAME, Université Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, F-75018, Paris, France. jeremy.seurat@inserm.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To get informative studies for nonlinear mixed effect models (NLMEM), design optimization can be performed based on Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) using the D-criterion. Its computation requires knowledge about models and parameters, which are often prior guesses. Thus, adaptive designs composed of several stages may be used. Robust approach can also be used to account for various candidate models. In the estimation step of a given stage, model selection (MS) or model averaging (MA) can be performed. In this work we propose a new two-stage adaptive design strategy, based on the robust expected FIM and MA over several candidate models. The methodology is applied to a clinical trial simulation in ophthalmology to optimize doses and time measurements. A set of dose-response candidate models is defined, and one-stage designs are compared to two-stage 50/50 designs (i.e., each stage performed with half of the available subjects), using either local optimal design or robust design, and performing analysis with one model, MS or MA. Performing a two-stage design with MS at the interim analysis can correct the choice of a wrong model for designing the first stage. Overall, starting from a robust design (1- or 2-stage) is valuable and leads to reasonable bias and precision. The proposed robust adaptive design strategy is a new tool to design longitudinal studies that could be used in different therapeutic areas.

Indexed as

Nonlinear DynamicsResearch DesignComputer SimulationHumansLongitudinal StudiesModels, StatisticalAdaptive designFisher information matrixModel averagingNon linear mixed effect modelOptimal design

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.