Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37466788›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2023

Development of an in chemico high-throughput screening method for the identification of skin sensitization potential.

Isabel Ferreira, Gonçalo Brites, Ana Silva, Francisco Caramelo, Bárbara Oliveiros, Bruno Miguel Neves, Maria Teresa Cruz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Intranasal Administration of Isoeugenol Improves Memory Deficits in APP/PS1 Old Mice-A Role Beyond Nrf2 Activation?FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Isabel Ferreira *Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology (CNC), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. icferreira@cnc.uc.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4934-917X
Gonçalo Brites *Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology (CNC), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3705-673X
Ana SilvaCenter for Neuroscience and Cell Biology (CNC), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4041-0376
Francisco CarameloLaboratory of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0015-8604
Bárbara OliveirosLaboratory of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7836-8161
Bruno Miguel Neves *Toxfinder LDA, IPN - Instituto Pedro Nunes, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7391-3124
Maria Teresa Cruz *Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology (CNC), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. trosete@ff.uc.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9846-6754
University of Coimbra · PTInstituto Pedro Nunes · PTInstituto de Telecomunicações · PT

Funding

Cosmetics Europe Cosmetics EuropeFCT: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PD/BDE/142926/2018FCT: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/110717/2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that chemical-peptide conjugation represents the molecular initiating event (MIE) in skin sensitization. This MIE has been successfully exploited in the development of in chemico peptide reactivity assays, with the Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA) being validated as a screening tool for skin sensitization hazard as well as an OECD test guideline. This test relies on the use of a high-performance liquid chromatography/ultraviolet detection method to quantify chemical-peptide conjugation through measurement of the depletion of two synthetic peptides containing lysine or cysteine residues, which is labor-intensive and time-consuming. To improve assay throughput, sensitivity, and accuracy, we have developed a spectrophotometric assay for skin sensitization potential based on MIE measurement-the ProtReact assay. ProtReact is also a cheaper, faster, simpler, and more accessible alternative for the DPRA, giving comparable results. A set of 106 chemicals was tested with ProtReact and the peptide depletion values compared with those reported for the DPRA. The predictive capacity of both assays was evaluated with human reference data. ProtReact and DPRA assays show similar predictive capacities for hazard identification (75% and 74%, respectively), although ProtReact showed a higher specificity (86% versus 74%, respectively) and lower sensitivity (69% versus 73%). Overall, the results show that ProtReact assay described here represents an efficient, economic, and accurate assay for the prediction of skin sensitization potential of chemical haptens.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysSkinAnimalsAnimal Testing AlternativesChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCysteineHumansPeptidesCysteinePeptidesDirect peptide reactivity assayIn chemico methodLow-molecular-weight chemicalsSkin sensitization

Identifiers

PMID37466788
PMCPMC10404171
OpenAlexW4384663522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.