Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37466732›Full record

Trial reportHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2023

The effect of an abdominal binder on postoperative outcome after open incisional hernia repair in sublay technique: a multicenter, randomized pilot trial (ABIHR-II).

P R Ortiz, E Lorenz, F Meyer, R Croner, S Lünse, R Hunger, R Mantke, A Benz-Weisser, K Zarras, M Huenerbein and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Abdominal binders in postoperative care: a scoping review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

P R OrtizCharité Universitätsmedizin-Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
E LorenzDepartment of General, Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Otto-Von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
F MeyerDepartment of General, Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Otto-Von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
R CronerDepartment of General, Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Otto-Von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
S LünseDepartment of General and Abdominal Surgery, Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Hochstrasse 29, 14770, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
R HungerFaculty of Medicine, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany.
R MantkeDepartment of General and Abdominal Surgery, Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Hochstrasse 29, 14770, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
A Benz-WeisserDepartment of General, Abdominal Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Westpfalz-Klinikum GmbH, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
K ZarrasDepartment of Abdominal Minimally Invasive and Cancer Surgery, Marien Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
M HuenerbeinCharité Universitätsmedizin-Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
C PaaschDepartment of General and Abdominal Surgery, Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Hochstrasse 29, 14770, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany. paasch.mhb@klinikum-brandenburg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3104-8288
University Hospital Magdeburg · DEMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DEUniversitätsklinikum Brandenburg an der Havel · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHelios Hospital Berlin-Buch · DEMarien Hospital Düsseldorf · DEWestpfalz Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough the evidence is minimal, an abdominal binder is commonly prescribed after open incisional hernia repair (IHR) to reduce pain. This study aimed to investigate this common postoperative treatment.

methodsThe ABIHR-II trial was a national prospective, randomized, multicenter non-AMG/MPG pilot study with two groups of patients (wearing an abdominal binder (AB) for 2 weeks during daytime vs. not wearing an AB following open IHR with the sublay technique). Patient enrollment took place from July 2020 to February 2022. The primary endpoint was pain at rest on the 14th postoperative day (POD) using the visual analog scale (VAS). The use of analgesics was not systematically recorded. Mixed-effects linear regression models were used.

resultsA total of 51 individuals were recruited (25 women, 26 men; mean age 61.4 years; mean body mass index 30.65 kg/m

conclusionWearing an AB did not have an impact on pain and seroma formation rate but it may reduce the rate of postoperative SSI within the first 14 days after surgery. Further trials are mandatory to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralIncisional HerniaFemaleHerniorrhaphyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainPilot ProjectsPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesSeromaSurgical MeshSurgical Wound InfectionAbdominal binderHerniaIncisional herniaOpen sublay repair

Identifiers

PMID37466732
PMCPMC10533646
OpenAlexW4384664550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.