Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37466402›Full record

ArticleMicrobial genomics2023

Parallel genetic adaptation of

Guohai Hu, Yue Wang, Christopher Blake, Mathilde Nordgaard, Xin Liu, Bo Wang, Ákos T Kovács

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Root colonization by beneficial rhizobacteria.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. How gut microbiome and blood metabolites drive ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine: a genome-wide association study based on the East Asian population.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guohai HuChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518120, PR China.
Yue WangChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518120, PR China.
Christopher BlakeBacterial Interactions and Evolution Group, DTU Bioengineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark.
Mathilde NordgaardBacterial Interactions and Evolution Group, DTU Bioengineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark.
Xin LiuChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518120, PR China.
Bo WangChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518120, PR China.
Ákos T KovácsBacterial Interactions and Evolution Group, DTU Bioengineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria benefit plants by stimulating their growth or protecting them against phytopathogens. Rhizobacteria must colonize and persist on plant roots to exert their benefits. However, little is known regarding the processes by which rhizobacteria adapt to different plant species, or behave under alternating host plant regimes. Here, we used experimental evolution and whole-population whole-genome sequencing to analyse how

Indexed as

ArabidopsisBacillus subtilisPlant RootsPlantsadaptationBacillus subtilisexperimental evolutionplant–bacteria interactiontrade-off

Identifiers

PMID37466402
PMCPMC10438812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.