Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37466327›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2024

Development and Validation of an Abridged Physical Frailty Phenotype for Clinical Use: A Cohort Study Among Kidney Transplant Candidates.

Xiaomeng Chen, Nadia M Chu, Valerie Thompson, Evelien E Quint, Sami Alasfar, Qian-Li Xue, Daniel C Brennan, Silas P Norman, Bonnie E Lonze, Jeremy D Walston and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frailty and Prehabilitation: Navigating the Road to a Successful Transplant.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Abdominal computed tomography measurements of body composition and waitlist mortality in kidney transplant candidates.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Aging and Infections in Solid Organ Transplantation: Unchartered Territory.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaomeng ChenDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Nadia M ChuDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Valerie ThompsonDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Evelien E QuintDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sami AlasfarDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Qian-Li XueDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8818-7444
Daniel C BrennanDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Silas P NormanDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Bonnie E LonzeDepartment of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Jeremy D WalstonDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Dorry L SegevDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Mara A McAdams-DeMarcoDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3013-925X
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Technological Assessment and Solutions Core - RC4P30AG021334 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jeremy D Walston · 2003 to 2026
$33.2M
Kidney transplantation in older, frail and cognitively impaired adults with ESRD: Balancing utility vs. justiceR01AG055781 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MCADAMS DEMARCO, MARA A. · 2017 to 2021
$4.2M
Hemodialysis-based interventions to preserve cognitive functionR01DK114074 · NIDDK · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MCADAMS DEMARCO, MARA A. · 2018 to 2022
$3.9M
Patient Oriented Research in Solid Organ TransplantationK24AI144954 · NIAID · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SEGEV, DORRY L. · 2020 to 2024
$956k
Impact of climate change on cognitive and physical aging of older kidney transplant recipientsK02AG076883 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Mara A. McAdams DeMarco · 2023 to 2026
$728k
Frailty, Post-Transplant Delirium, and Neurocognitive Underpinnings of AlzheimersK01AG064040 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHU, NADIA MIKHAIL · 2020 to 2022
$390k
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI144954NIA NIH HHS K01 AG064040NIA NIH HHS K02 AG076883NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021334NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055781NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK114074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrailty is associated with poor outcomes in surgical patients including kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Transplant centers that measure frailty have better pre- and postoperative outcomes. However, clinical utility of existing tools is low due to time constraints. To address this major barrier to implementation in the preoperative evaluation of patients, we developed an abridged frailty phenotype.

methodsThe abridged frailty phenotype was developed by simplifying the 5 physical frailty phenotype (PFP) components in a two-center prospective cohort of 3 220 KT candidates and tested for efficiency (time to completion) in 20 candidates evaluation (January 2009 to March 2020). We examined area under curve (AUC) and Cohen's kappa agreement to compare the abridged assessment with the PFP. We compared waitlist mortality risk (competing risks models) by frailty using the PFP and abridged assessment, respectively. Model discrimination was assessed using Harrell's C-statistic.

resultsOf 3 220 candidates, the PFP and abridged assessment identified 23.8% and 27.4% candidates as frail, respectively. The abridged frailty phenotype had substantial agreement (kappa = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.66-0.71) and excellent discrimination (AUC = 0.861). Among 20 patients at evaluation, abridged assessment took 5-7 minutes to complete. The PFP and abridged assessment had similar associations with waitlist mortality (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.26-2.08 vs SHR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.33-2.16) and comparable mortality discrimination (p = .51).

conclusionsThe abridged assessment is an efficient and valid way to identify frailty. It predicts waitlist mortality without sacrificing discrimination. Surgical departments should consider utilizing the abridged assessment to evaluate frailty in patients when time is limited.

Indexed as

FrailtyKidney TransplantationCohort StudiesHumansPhenotypeProspective StudiesEpidemiologyFrailtyKidney

Identifiers

PMID37466327
PMCPMC10733181
OpenAlexW4384664899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.