ArticleHuman brain mapping2023
Accounting for temporal variability in functional magnetic resonance imaging improves prediction of intelligence.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neuroimage analysis using artificial intelligence approaches: a systematic review.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Pooled it
- Effect sizes for brain-based predictive models of cognition across the lifespan.Communications psychology · 2026Review
- Human brain fingerprint-like nodes within RSFC: an exploratory study and their role in RSFC-behavior associations.Brain imaging and behavior · 2026Article
- Brain regions beyond the visual cortex are relevant to subjective time prediction from fMRI salient events in a visual naturalistic context.Brain imaging and behavior · 2026Article
- Transformers for fMRI analysis: from spatiotemporal modeling to brain foundation models.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2026Review
- Brain networks and intelligence: A graph neural network based approach to resting state fMRI data.Medical image analysis · 2025Article
- Brain Networks and Intelligence: A Graph Neural Network Based Approach to Resting State fMRI Data.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Individual cognitive traits can be predicted from task-based dynamic functional connectivity with a deep convolutional-recurrent model.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Accounting for temporal variability in functional magnetic resonance imaging improves prediction of intelligence.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Altered cortical and subcortical morphometric features and asymmetries in the subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroimaging-based prediction methods for intelligence have seen a rapid development. Among different neuroimaging modalities, prediction using functional connectivity (FC) has shown great promise. Most literature has focused on prediction using static FC, with limited investigations on the merits of such analysis compared to prediction using dynamic FC or region-level functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) times series that encode temporal variability. To account for the temporal dynamics in fMRI, we propose a bi-directional long short-term memory (bi-LSTM) approach that incorporates feature selection mechanism. The proposed pipeline is implemented via an efficient algorithm and applied for predicting intelligence using region-level time series and dynamic FC. We compare the prediction performance using different fMRI features acquired from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study involving nearly 7000 individuals. Our detailed analysis illustrates the consistently inferior performance of static FC compared to region-level time series or dynamic FC for single and combined rest and task fMRI experiments. The joint analysis of task and rest fMRI leads to improved intelligence prediction under all models compared to using fMRI from only one experiment. In addition, the proposed bi-LSTM pipeline based on region-level time series identifies several shared and differential important brain regions across fMRI experiments that drive intelligence prediction. A test-retest analysis of the selected regions shows strong reliability across cross-validation folds. Given the large sample size of ABCD study, our results provide strong evidence that superior prediction of intelligence can be achieved by accounting for temporal variations in fMRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.