Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37466172›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2023

Learning curve of lung dose optimization in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Mitsunobu Igari, Takanori Abe, Misaki Iino, Satoshi Saito, Tomomi Aoshika, Yasuhiro Ryuno, Tomohiro Ohta, Ryuta Hirai, Yu Kumazaki, Shin-Ei Noda and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mitsunobu IgariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Takanori AbeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6209-9446
Misaki IinoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Satoshi SaitoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Tomomi AoshikaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Yasuhiro RyunoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Tomohiro OhtaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Ryuta HiraiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Yu KumazakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Shin-Ei NodaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Shingo KatoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been increasingly used for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). However, there are some barriers to implementing IMRT for LA-NSCLC, including the complexity of treatment plan optimization. This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve of lung dose optimization in IMRT for LA-NSCLC and identify the factors that affect the degree of achievement of lung dose optimization.

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 40 consecutive patients with LA-NSCLC who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy at our institution. These 40 patients were divided into two groups: 20 initially treated patients (earlier group) and 20 subsequently treated patients (later group). Patient and tumor characteristics were compared between the two groups. The dose-volume parameter ratio between the actually delivered IMRT plan and the simulated three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plan was also compared between the two groups to determine the learning curve of lung dose optimization.

resultsThe dose-volume parameter ratio for lung volume to receive more than 5 Gy (lung V5) and mean lung dose (MLD) significantly decreased in later groups. The spread of the beam path and insufficient optimization of dose coverage of planning target volume (PTV) might cause poor control of lung V5, MLD.

conclusionsA learning curve for lung dose optimization was observed with the accumulation of experience. Appropriate techniques, such as restricting the beam path and ensuring dose coverage of PTV during the optimization process, are essential to control lung dose in IMRT for LA-NSCLC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedHumansLearning CurveLungRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective Studiesintensity-modulated radiotherapylearning curvelung cancerlung doseoptimization

Identifiers

PMID37466172
PMCPMC10493474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.