Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37465991›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2023

Longitudinal efficacy and safety modeling and simulation framework to aid dose selection of belantamab mafodotin for patients with multiple myeloma.

Jon Collins, Martijn van Noort, Chetan Rathi, Teun M Post, Herbert Struemper, Roxanne C Jewell, Geraldine Ferron-Brady

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jon CollinsGSK, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Martijn van NoortLeiden Experts on Advanced Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Chetan RathiGSK, Upper Providence, Pennsylvania, USA.
Teun M PostLeiden Experts on Advanced Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Herbert StruemperGSK, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Roxanne C JewellGSK, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Geraldine Ferron-BradyGSK, Upper Providence, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5703-8315
Leiden University · NLProvidence College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Belantamab mafodotin, a monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF)-containing monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), demonstrated deep and durable responses in the DRiving Excellence in Approaches to Multiple Myeloma (DREAMM)-1 and pivotal DREAMM-2 studies in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. As with other MMAF-containing ADCs, ocular adverse events were observed. To predict the effects of belantamab mafodotin dosing regimens and dose-modification strategies on efficacy and ocular safety end points, DREAMM-1 and DREAMM-2 data across a range of doses were used to develop an integrated simulation framework incorporating two separate longitudinal models and the published population pharmacokinetic model. A concentration-driven tumor growth inhibition model described the time course of serum M-protein concentration, a measure of treatment response, whereas a discrete time Markov model described the time course of ocular events graded with the GSK Keratopathy and Visual Acuity scale. Significant covariates included baseline β

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedbelantamab mafodotin

Identifiers

PMID37465991
PMCPMC10583243
OpenAlexW4384664763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.