Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37465989›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2023

Impact of moist wound dressing on wound healing time: A meta-analysis.

Zhengbo Liang, Ping Lai, Jing Zhang, Qing Lai, Lin He

RetractedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. 'No Dressing' Strategy for Post-operative Orthopaedic Cases.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhengbo LiangDepartment of Anesthesia Surgery Center, Peoples Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang City, Sichuan, China.
Ping LaiDepartment of Anesthesia Surgery Center, Peoples Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang City, Sichuan, China.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Anesthesia Surgery Center, Peoples Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang City, Sichuan, China.
Qing LaiDepartment of Anesthesia Surgery Center, Peoples Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang City, Sichuan, China.
Lin HeDepartment of Nursing, Peoples Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang City, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0584-3529

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the assortment of available dressings aimed at promoting wound healing, moist dressings have gained significant popularity because of their ability to create an optimal environment for wound recovery. This meta-analysis seeks to compare the effects of moist dressing versus gauze dressing on wound healing time. A comprehensive literature search was conducted, encompassing publications up until April 1, 2023, across multiple databases including PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Cochrane Library. Stringent criteria were used to determine study inclusion and evaluate methodological quality. Statistical analyses were performed utilizing Stata 17.0. A total of 13 articles, encompassing 866 participants, were included in the analysis. The findings indicate that moist dressing surpasses gauze dressing in terms of wound healing time (standard mean difference [SMD] -2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.35 to -1.66, p < 0.01; I

Indexed as

BandagesWound HealingChinaHumansSurgical Wound Infectiongauze dressingsimpactmeta-analysismoist dressingswound healing time

Identifiers

PMID37465989
PMCPMC10681401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.