ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2023
Robotic surgery in Gynecology: the present and the future.
Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Costs and cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted surgery in South Korea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of European regionwide and Japanese nationwide surveys on gynecologic robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Surgical management of uterine fibroids.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Review
- The Revolution in Surgery That Saves Millions of Lives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic Sacropexy Versus Vaginal Sacrospinous Fixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Comparison of Surgical Outcomes and Quality of Life.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology (IPSO) Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Guidelines.Ecancermedicalscience · 2026Article
- Article
- The trends and evolution of robotic surgery in taiwan: a 14-year nationwide analysis (2011-2024).Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Pioneering robotic surgery for complex gynecologic conditions: implementation beyond cancer care.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Surgical time in gynecologic surgery using laparoscopic articulated instruments (KGOG 4002).Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2025Article
- Comments on: "The environmental impact of multi-specialty robotic-assisted surgery: a waste audit".Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Robotic-assisted surgery in benign gynecology: single-center experience with 106 patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Characterizing Research Hotspots and Trends in Simulation-Based Training in Obstetrics and Gynecology 1961-2024: A Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Respiratory training reduces postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly gynecological patients undergoing general anesthesia.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Ovarian neoplasms - the role of minimally invasive surgery.Ecancermedicalscience · 2025Article
- Efficacy between Conventional Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery in Mexican Patients with Endometriosis: A Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Robotic sacrocolpopexy.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2024Article
- Clinical relevance of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecology.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes between the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System and da Vinci® Xi in Robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Since its introduction, laparoscopic surgery has been often preferred over open surgery in obstetrics and gynecology due to its advantages, such as less bleeding, lower incidence of adhesions, reduced postoperative pain, short hospital stay, and quick return to daily life. However, in the case of complex surgeries, laparoscopy presented some limitations. Nonetheless, since the 1980s, medical robots have been introduced to overcome the technical limitations of laparoscopy and start a new age for minimally invasive surgery. In this review, we explore the indications and advantages and disadvantages of robotic surgery in the field of gynecology, and try to assess the recent trend of robotic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.