ReviewCureus2023
Pulp Changes Secondary to Orthodontic Forces: A Review of Literature.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cytokines as Key Drivers of Pathological Root Resorption: Integrating Molecular Mechanisms, Genetic Determinants, and Biomarker-Based Insights.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Article
- Clinical Correlation of Orthodontic-Endodontic Treatment Planning of Traumatized Teeth: An Original Research.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Assessment of pulpal changes in periodontitis patients using CBCT: a volumetric analysis.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Article
- Volumetric pulpal changes in permanent first molars following AdvanSyncTM and Twin Block functional appliance: A CBCT study.Journal of orthodontic science · 2025Article
- Microbiome differences between trauma- and caries-derived periapical lesions using next-generation sequencing.Journal of oral microbiology · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review article encompasses the literature pertaining to changes in the dental pulp subsequent to forces exerted secondary to orthodontic treatment. The review was conducted at the College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia, from October 2022 to February 2023. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library and Google Scholar for articles from 2000 to 2023. Keywords and MeSH terms used were 'orthodontic forces', 'pulp changes', 'dental pulpal changes', and 'pulp volume'. Two reviewers went through the titles. After removing irrelevant and duplicate articles, abstracts were assessed for relevant articles. Finally, the reviewers analyzed full-text articles, and a total of five articles including four randomized controlled trials and one retrospective study were selected. It was concluded that managing and minimizing injury to the pulp or supporting tissues is important when using orthodontic mechanics. In order to do so, clinicians must thoroughly understand any change in the pulpal tissue following the orthodontic treatment. Orthodontic tooth movements cause inflammatory changes in the tooth pulp and periodontal ligament which are directly related to the amount, direction, and time duration of force used. Long-term pulp blood flow analysis shows that even though there is a transient uptrend in the flow of blood after the removal of the orthodontic force, it reverts to normal levels three months later. However, pulp volume has been reported to decrease, more prominently in anterior teeth, as orthodontic forces stimulate the pulp to produce tertiary dentin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.