Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37465807›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Harnessing Large Language Models in Nursing Care Planning: Opportunities, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations.

Abdulqadir J Nashwan, Ahmad A Abujaber

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. PICOT questions and search strategies formulation: A novel approach using artificial intelligence automation.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Based on Medicine, The Now and Future of Large Language Models.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Generative AI Demonstrated Difficulty Reasoning on Nursing Flowsheet Data.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abdulqadir J NashwanNursing Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Ahmad A AbujaberNursing Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI) and the emergence of large language models (LLMs), like GPT-4, create a unique opportunity to transform nursing care planning. In this editorial, we explore the potential applications of AI in the nursing process, with a focus on patient data assessment and interpretation, communication with patients and families, identifying gaps in care plans, and ongoing professional development. We also examine the ethical concerns and challenges associated with AI integration in healthcare, such as data privacy and security, fairness and bias, accountability and responsibility, and the delicate balance between human-AI collaboration. To implement LLMs responsibly and effectively in nursing care planning, we recommend prioritizing robust data security measures, transparent and unbiased algorithms, clear accountability guidelines, and human-AI collaboration. By addressing these issues, we can improve nursing care planning and ensure the best possible care for patients.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceethical considerationshuman-ai collaborationlarge language modelsnursing care planning

Identifiers

PMID37465807
PMCPMC10350541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.