Insights from specimen data for two economic

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Optimizing trap design, lure, and color for monitoring Chrysobothris mali (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in California walnut orchards.Environmental entomology · 2026
   Article
2. Molecular Techniques and Ecological Data for Taxonomically Difficult Groups: A Case Study of a Morphologically Variable New Species in the GenusInsects · 2026
   Article
3. De Novo Transcriptome Assembly of Cedar (Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
   Article
4. Commodity risk assessment of maple veneer sheets from Canada.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
   Article
5. Toward a brighter future for entomological collections.Annals of the Entomological Society of America · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as