Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37465702›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2023

Costs and Consequences of a Novel Emergency Department Sepsis Diagnostic Test: The IntelliSep Index.

Christopher S Hollenbeak, Daniel J Henning, Glenn K Geeting, Nathan A Ledeboer, Imran A Faruqi, Christi G Pierce, Christopher B Thomas, Hollis R O'Neal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher S HollenbeakDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Daniel J HenningDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Glenn K GeetingDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Grant Memorial Hospital, Petersburg, WV.
Nathan A LedeboerDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Molecular Diagnostics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Imran A FaruqiDepartment of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Baton Rouge, LA.
Christi G PierceOur Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center, Baton Rouge, LA.
Christopher B ThomasDepartment of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Baton Rouge, LA.
Hollis R O'NealDepartment of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Baton Rouge, LA.
Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis causes 270,000 deaths and costs $38 billion annually in the United States. Most cases of sepsis present in the emergency department (ED), where rapid diagnosis remains challenging. The IntelliSep Index (ISI) is a novel diagnostic test that analyzes characteristics of WBC structure and provides a reliable early signal for sepsis. This study performs a cost-consequence analysis of the ISI relative to procalcitonin for early sepsis diagnosis in the ED. PERSPECTIVE: U.S. healthcare system.

settingCommunity hospital ED.

methodsA decision tree analysis was performed comparing ISI with procalcitonin. Model parameters included prevalence of sepsis, sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests (both ISI and procalcitonin), costs of hospitalization, and mortality rate stratified by diagnostic test result. Mortality and prevalence of sepsis were estimated from best available literature. Costs were estimated based on an analysis of a large, national discharge dataset, and adjusted to 2018 U.S. dollars. Outcomes included expected costs and survival.

resultsAssuming a confirmed sepsis prevalence of 16.9% (adjudicated to Sepsis-3), the ISI strategy had an expected cost per patient of $3,849 and expected survival rate of 95.08%, whereas the procalcitonin strategy had an expected cost of $4,656 per patient and an expected survival of 94.98%. ISI was both less costly and more effective than procalcitonin, primarily because of fewer false-negative results. These results were robust in sensitivity analyses.

conclusionsISI was both less costly and more effective in preventing mortality than procalcitonin, primarily because of fewer false-negative results. The ISI may provide health systems with a higher-value diagnostic test in ED sepsis evaluation. Additional work is needed to validate these results in clinical practice.

Indexed as

decision analysisemergency departmenthealthcare costssepsis

Identifiers

PMID37465702
PMCPMC10351935
OpenAlexW4384283434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.