ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
Different internal fixation methods for Hoffa-like fractures of the tibial plateau: a finite element analysis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomechanical comparison of five fixation methods in minimally invasive hallux valgus osteotomy: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Long-term surgical outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in patients with Hoffa-like tibial plateau fractures: a clinical study and analysis.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the low incidence of posteromedial tibial plateau fractures and limited clinical data available, the optimal treatment for this type of fracture remains to be established. This type of fracture, also known as Hoffa-like fracture of the tibial plateau, shares a similar mechanism of injury with the Hoffa fracture of the femoral condyle. In the field of orthopedics, finite element analysis is considered a valuable method to guide clinical decision-making. In this study, four methods used for internal fixation of Hoffa-like fractures of the tibial plateau were compared using computer simulation and applying a finite element method (FEM). The methods compared were lateral L-plate fixation alone (Model A); lateral L-plate combined with posterior anti-slip plate (reconstruction plate/T-plate) fixation (Model B); lateral L-plate combined with posterior hollow nail fixation of the fracture block (Model C); and lateral L-plate combined with anterior hollow nail fixation of the fracture (Model D). The maximum displacement of the model and the maximum stress of the internal fixation material were analyzed by applying an axial load of 2,500 N. The results showed that, in the normal bone model, the maximum displacement of the fracture in Model A was 0.60032 mm, with improved stability through the addition of posterior lateral plate fixation in Model B and reduction of the displacement to 0.38882 mm. The maximum displacement in Model C and Model D was comparable, amounting to 0.42345 mm and 0.42273 mm, respectively. Maximum stress was 1235.6 MPa for Model A, 84.724 MPa for Model B, 99.805 MPa for Model C, and 103.19 MPa for Model D. In the internal fixation analysis of the osteoporotic fracture model, we observed patterns similar to the results of the normal bone model. The results indicated that Model B yielded the overall best results in the treatment of Hoffa-like fractures of the tibial plateau. The orthopedic surgeon may wish to implement these insights into the perioperative algorithm, thereby refining and optimizing clinical patient care. In addition, our findings pave the way for future research efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.