Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37465632›Full record

ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2023

Operator-patient sex discordance and periprocedural outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (from the ORPKI Polish National Registry).

Artur Dziewierz, Birgit Vogel, Barbara Zdzierak, Martyna Kuleta, Krzysztof P Malinowski, Tomasz Rakowski, Aleksandra Piotrowska, Roxana Mehran, Zbigniew Siudak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact Factor 2.0: a milestone and a call to action forPostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Water or Warrior? Women in Congenital Cardiac Interventions Reflect on Their Journeys.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. The gender gap in interventional cardiology research: insights fromPostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Women in interventional cardiology - patients' and operators' perspectives.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Artur Dziewierz2 Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Birgit VogelZena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Barbara ZdzierakClinical Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, University Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Martyna KuletaCollegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Krzysztof P MalinowskiDepartment of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Tomasz Rakowski2 Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Aleksandra PiotrowskaCollegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Roxana MehranZena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Zbigniew SiudakCollegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PLJan Kochanowski University · PLIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A recent study suggested that sex discordance between surgeons and patients negatively affects the outcomes of patients undergoing common surgical procedures. Aim: We sought to assess whether such an impact exists for periprocedural outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Material and methods: From 2014 to 2020, data on 581,744 patients undergoing single-stage coronary angiography and PCI from 154 centers were collected. Patients were divided into four groups based on the patient and operator sex. Operator-patient sex discordance was defined as the procedure done by a male operator on a female patient or by a female operator on a male patient. Results: Of 581,744 patients treated by 34 female and 782 male operators, 194,691 patients were sex discordant with their operator (female operator with male patient 12,479; male operator with female patient 182,212) while 387,053 were sex concordant (female operator with female patient 6,068; male operator with male patient 380,985). Among female patients, no difference in the risk of periprocedural complications, including death (0.65% vs. 0.82%; Conclusions: No detrimental effect of operator-patient sex discordance on periprocedural outcomes was confirmed in all-comer patients undergoing PCI. Some of the observed differences in outcomes were primarily related to the differences in baseline risk profile.

Indexed as

complicationsdoctor-patient interactiongenderpatient-physician relationshipsex

Identifiers

PMID37465632
PMCPMC10351079
OpenAlexW4384078781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.