ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023
Stroke-GFCN: ischemic stroke lesion prediction with a fully convolutional graph network.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The interpretation of image data plays a critical role during acute brain stroke diagnosis, and promptly defining the requirement of a surgical intervention will drastically impact the patient's outcome. However, determining stroke lesions purely from images can be a daunting task. Many studies proposed automatic segmentation methods for brain stroke lesions from medical images in different modalities, though heretofore results do not satisfy the requirements to be clinically reliable. We investigate the segmentation of brain stroke lesions using a geometric deep learning model that takes advantage of the intrinsic interconnected diffusion features in a set of multi-modal inputs consisting of computer tomography (CT) perfusion parameters. Approach: We propose a geometric deep learning model for the segmentation of ischemic stroke brain lesions that employs spline convolutions and unpooling/pooling operators on graphs to excerpt graph-structured features in a fully convolutional network architecture. In addition, we seek to understand the underlying principles governing the different components of our model. Accordingly, we structure the experiments in two parts: an evaluation of different architecture hyperparameters and a comparison with state-of-the-art methods. Results: The ablation study shows that deeper layers obtain a higher Dice coefficient score (DCS) of up to 0.3654. Comparing different pooling and unpooling methods shows that the best performing unpooling method is the proportional approach, yet it often smooths the segmentation border. Unpooling achieves segmentation results more adapted to the lesion boundary corroborated with systematic lower values of Hausdorff distance. The model performs at the level of state-of-the-art models without optimized training methods, such as augmentation or patches, with a DCS of Conclusions: We proposed and evaluated an end-to-end trainable fully convolutional graph network architecture using spline convolutional layers for the ischemic stroke lesion prediction. We propose a model that employs graph-based operations to predict acute stroke brain lesions from CT perfusion parameters. Our results prove the feasibility of using geometric deep learning to solve segmentation problems, and our model shows a better performance than other models evaluated. The proposed model achieves improved metric values for the DCS metric, ranging from 8.61% to 69.05%, compared with other models trained under the same conditions. Next, we compare different pooling and unpooling operations in relation to their segmentation results, and we show that the model can produce segmentation outputs that adapt to irregular segmentation boundaries when using simple heuristic unpooling operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.