Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37465561›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2023

Response to endobronchial valve treatment: it's all about the target lobe.

Jorine E Hartman, Sharyn A Roodenburg, Marlies van Dijk, T David Koster, Karin Klooster, Dirk-Jan Slebos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lung volume reduction: surgeryBreathe (Sheffield, England) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jorine E HartmanDepartment of Pulmonary diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8765-9673
Sharyn A RoodenburgDepartment of Pulmonary diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6579-7386
Marlies van DijkDepartment of Pulmonary diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-1276
T David KosterDepartment of Pulmonary diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8550-0722
Karin KloosterDepartment of Pulmonary diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Dirk-Jan SlebosDepartment of Pulmonary diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9555-3422
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial valves (EBV) has been shown to be beneficial for severe emphysema patients. The most important predictor of treatment response is absence of collateral ventilation between the treatment target and ipsilateral lobe. However, there are still a substantial number of nonresponders and it would be useful to improve the pre-treatment identification of responders. Presumably, predictors of response will be multifactorial, and therefore our aim was to explore whether we can identify response groups using a cluster analysis. Methods: At baseline and 1 year follow-up, pulmonary function, exercise capacity and quality of life were measured. A quantitative chest computed tomography scan analysis was performed at baseline and 2-6 months follow-up. The cluster analysis was performed using a hierarchical agglomerative method. Results: In total, 428 patients (69% female, mean±sd age 61±8 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s 27±8% predicted, residual volume 254±50% pred) were included in our analysis. Three clusters were generated: one nonresponder cluster and two responder clusters. Despite solid technical procedures, the nonresponder cluster had significantly less clinical response after treatment compared to the other clusters. The nonresponder cluster was characterised by significantly less emphysematous destruction, less air trapping and a higher perfusion of the target lobe, and a more homogeneous distribution of emphysema and perfusion between the target and ipsilateral lobe. Conclusions: We found that target lobe characteristics are the discriminators between responders and nonresponders, which underlines the importance of visual and quantitative assessment of the potential treatment target lobe when selecting patients for EBV treatment.

Identifiers

PMID37465561
PMCPMC10350677
OpenAlexW4378212675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.