ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2023
Long-term observation on safety and visual quality of implantable collamer lens V4c implantation for myopia correction: a 5-year follow-up.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) Surgery Versus Contact Lens-Based Correction with Backup Spectacles in Young Adults-A Norwegian Societal Perspective.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Implantable collamer lens combined with femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy and toric implantable collamer lens for high myopia with moderate-to-low astigmatism corrections: a comparative study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Enhanced astigmatism correction accuracy with image-guided toric ICL implantation: a comparative clinical analysis with manual axis marking.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- One-year evaluation of rotational stability and visual outcomes following horizontal, vertical, and oblique implantation of ICL V4c.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Visual related quality of life after ICL V4c implantation in high myopia patients: a mini review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Clinical prediction of insufficient vaults after implantable collamer lens implantation.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes with implantable collamer lens.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo elucidate the safety and visual quality of implantable collamer lens with central hole (ICL V4c) implantation for correcting moderate and high myopia for at least 5y.
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted on 58 patients (114 eyes) who were followed up for at least 5y after ICL V4c implantation. The observation was done before and on 1d, 1mo, 1 and 5y or more after the surgical procedure. The visual acuity, subjective refraction, intraocular pressure, vault, axial length, central hole position, pupil diameter, visual quality, and adverse events were analyzed. The visual quality includes aberration, the modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTF cutoff), objective scattering index (OSI), Stroller's ratio (SR), and visual quality questionnaire.
resultsThe average follow-up period was 69.25±3.80mo (range 60-82mo) and the preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -8.66±1.97 D. At 5y after operation, the safety index was 1.01±0.02 and the efficacy index was 0.99±0.42 and SE was -0.65±0.63 D. The 59.6% of the eyes achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20, 76.3% of the eyes had SE within ±1.0 D at the last visit. The axial length increased by 0.29±0.71 mm 5y after the surgery (
conclusionLong-term ICL V4c implantation is safe, effective, and stable for correcting moderate and to high myopia, and the visual quality with patients is excellent and satisfactory, but the progression of axial length still needs attention after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.