Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37465492›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

An international consensus definition for contextual factors: findings from a nominal group technique.

Chad E Cook, Antoine Bailliard, Jennifer A Bent, Joel E Bialosky, Elisa Carlino, Luana Colloca, Jorge E Esteves, Dave Newell, Alvisa Palese, William R Reed and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06361472 (A Two-Center, Investigator-Blinded, Randomized, 4-Week, Parallel-Group, Superiority Study Comparing Contextual Factors-Enriched Standard Care Versus Standard Care Only for Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06361472 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Two-Center, Investigator-Blinded, Randomized, 4-Week, Parallel-Group, Superiority Study Comparing Contextual Factors-Enriched Standard Care Versus Standard Care Only for Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain (ContextualizAR Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Nacional de la MatanzaRan2024 to 2027Enrolled94ConditionsNeck PainArmsStandard Care, Contextual Factors
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chad E CookDepartment of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Antoine BailliardDepartment of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Jennifer A BentDepartment of Rehabilitation, Duke University Hospital System, Durham, NC, United States.
Joel E BialoskyDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Elisa CarlinoDepartment of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Luana CollocaDepartement of Pain and Translational Symptom Science and the Placebo Beyond Opinions Center, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Jorge E EstevesClinical-Based Human Research Department, Foundation COME Collaboration, Pescara, Italy.
Dave NewellAnglo-European College of Chiropractic University College, Bournemouth, United Kingdom.
Alvisa PaleseDepartment of Medical Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
William R ReedDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Jennifer Plumb VilardagaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Giacomo RossettiniSchool of Physiotherapy, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Funding

Force-Based Manipulations Research NetworkU24AT011969 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Chad Cook, William Ray Reed · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT011969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Emerging literature suggests contextual factors are important components of therapeutic encounters and may substantially influence clinical outcomes of a treatment intervention. At present, a single consensus definition of contextual factors, which is universal across all health-related conditions is lacking. The objective of this study was to create a consensus definition of contextual factors to better refine this concept for clinicians and researchers. Design: The study used a multi-stage virtual Nominal Group Technique (vNGT) to create and rank contextual factor definitions. Nominal group techniques are a form of consensus-based research, and are beneficial for identifying problems, exploring solutions and establishing priorities. Setting: International. Main outcome measures: The initial stages of the vNGT resulted in the creation of 14 independent contextual factor definitions. After a prolonged discussion period, the initial definitions were heavily modified, and 12 final definitions were rank ordered by the vNGT participants from first to last. Participants: The 10 international vNGT participants had a variety of clinical backgrounds and research specializations and were all specialists in contextual factors research. Results: A sixth round was used to identify a final consensus, which reflected the complexity of contextual factors and included three primary domains: (1) an overall definition; (2) qualifiers that serve as examples of the key areas of the definition; and (3) how contextual factors may influence clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Our consensus definition of contextual factors seeks to improve the understanding and communication between clinicians and researchers. These are especially important in recognizing their potential role in moderating and/or mediating clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

clinical outcomesconsensus researchcontextual factorsnominal group techniqueplacebo

Identifiers

PMID37465492
PMCPMC10351924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.