ArticleEplasty2023
Use of an Autologous Heterogenous Skin Construct in the Treatment of Intractable Late-Effect Radiation Wounds: Case Series.
Article in Eplasty, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Late-effect radiation-induced wounds represent a particularly difficult category of wounds to manage and treat. Fibrosis, impaired cellular activity, ischemia, and wound chronicity all work to impair healing, and this becomes more pronounced when defects are large or when avascular structures such as bone are exposed. Effective treatment options for this type of wound are limited. Thorough excision of irradiated tissue followed by distal pedicled or free flap closure is the most successful; however, this often requires multiple-stage surgeries and prolonged hospitalization and is associated with significant donor site morbidity. This is complicated further when wounds are large or in difficult locations, when surgery is not appropriate, or when there is limited access to surgeons with the appropriate experience/skill to perform such procedures. Methods: This case series describes the use of an autologous heterogenous skin construct (AHSC) made from a small full-thickness sample of the patient's healthy skin. Three patients with intractable late-effect radiation wounds were treated with AHSC. Case 1 describes an abdominal wound with tunneling of 7.5 cm to the pubic symphysis, which had been treated for known osteomyelitis, and a shallower full-thickness groin wound. Case 2 describes a right scapular wound with exposed bone, which had failed flap closure. Case 3 describes a right thigh wound in a patient who had been treated for sarcoma with extensive radiation therapy. This eventually resulted in an above-the-knee amputation, which failed to heal, and full exposure of the distal end of the resected femur. All wounds had been present for greater than 10 months. Results: Mean percent volume reduction was 83% (±2.7) at 3 weeks and 92.9% (±4.7) at 4 weeks. The tunneled abdominal wound decreased in depth from 7.5 cm to 1.2 cm in 3 weeks. Complete closure was achieved at 11 weeks for the abdominal and groin wounds (patient 1) and at 16 weeks for the thigh wound (patient 3). The scapular wound volume of patient 2 had decreased by 91.8% at week 4 but was not fully restored until week 21. Mean time to closure was 16.1 (±4.7) weeks. Conclusions: AHSC was effective in covering exposed bone, improving wound bed vascularity, filling in significant wound depth, and achieving complete wound closure with one application in patients with intractable late-effect radiation wounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37465475PMC10350875W4384665001What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.