Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37465432›Full record

ArticleJournal of family & reproductive health2022

Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Regarding Menstrual Cup Among Females in an Urban Setting of South Kerala.

Gayathri Mallika Sudevan Devan, Gayathri Mohanan, Gowri Krishna Ajitha, Haripriya Kavitha, Ijaz Majeed, Anjana Nalinakumari Kesavan Nair

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family & reproductive health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Beyond the Pad: Barriers and Facilitators to Menstrual Cup Use Among Medical Undergraduates in South India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gayathri Mallika Sudevan DevanSree Uthradom Thirunal Academy of Medical Sciences, Vencode, Kerala, India.
Gayathri MohananSree Uthradom Thirunal Academy of Medical Sciences, Vencode, Kerala, India.
Gowri Krishna AjithaSree Uthradom Thirunal Academy of Medical Sciences, Vencode, Kerala, India.
Haripriya KavithaSree Uthradom Thirunal Academy of Medical Sciences, Vencode, Kerala, India.
Ijaz MajeedSree Uthradom Thirunal Academy of Medical Sciences, Vencode, Kerala, India.
Anjana Nalinakumari Kesavan NairDepartment of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, India.
Government Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding menstrual cups use and the factors associated with it among females of the reproductive age group in an urban setting of South Kerala. Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study from December 2021 to January 2022 among females of the reproductive age group. Data was entered in MS Excel and was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 26.0. The significance of association was tested using the Chi-square test. Binary logistic regression was done to predict the factors associated with knowledge levels regarding menstrual cup. Results: The mean age of study participants was 25.68(SD 6.64) years. Lack of knowledge (22.6%) and fear of insertion (56.2%) were the major reasons for not trying a menstrual cup. Out of the 350 study participants, 258(73.7%) had good knowledge scores and 92(26.3%) had poor knowledge scores. Discomfort and leakage were the most important problems reported by participants. A statistically significant association was found between younger age, educational status, socioeconomic, status, marital status of females in the reproductive age group, and knowledge about the menstrual cup. Conclusion: Most of the participants (93.4%) were aware of menstrual cups. Even though two third of the participants had good knowledge regarding menstrual cups, only 15.1% have tried to use a menstrual cup. Fear of insertion was the most common concern for not trying a menstrual cup. Discomfort and leakage were the most important problems reported by participants. Younger age and higher educational qualifications were found to be independently associated with knowledge levels regarding menstrual cups.

Indexed as

AttitudeKeralaKnowledgeMenstrual CupPractices

Identifiers

PMID37465432
PMCPMC10350547
OpenAlexW4311319024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.