Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37465408›Full record

ArticleJournal of education & teaching in emergency medicine2020

A Just-in-Time Video Primer on Pneumothorax Pathophysiology and Early Management.

Nicholas MacDonald, Jacob Garcia, Gregory C Kane, Xiao Chi Zhang, Dimitrios Papanagnou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas MacDonaldThomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA.
Jacob GarciaThomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA.
Gregory C KaneThomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA.
Xiao Chi ZhangThomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Department of Emergency Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Dimitrios PapanagnouThomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Department of Emergency Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Jefferson University Hospitals · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Audience: Emergency medicine residents (interns, junior residents), medical students, and mid-level providers (physician assistants, nurse practitioners). Introduction: Pneumothorax refers to the presence of gas within the pleural space and is a relatively common clinical entity in the emergency department.1 Traumatic pneumothorax results from blunt or penetrating trauma to the thorax. Iatrogenic pneumothorax is a risk inherent to a number of invasive procedures and represents a significant cause of preventable morbidity.2 Specifically, central venous catheterization (43.8%), thoracentesis (20.1%), and barotrauma due to mechanical ventilation (9.1%) are the most frequent causes.3A feared complication of pneumothorax is the development of tension pneumothorax, which involves the compression of mediastinal structures by increased pressures within the pleural space, leading to hemodynamic compromise.4 As tension pneumothorax is an emergent, life-threatening condition, the management of pneumothorax and the insertion of chest tubes are skills required of physicians involved in the care of injured patients, including general surgeons, intensivists, and emergency medicine physicians.5 The process of correcting pneumothorax is not without complication. Complications following chest tube insertion in trauma patients occur in 19% of cases,6 and are commonly a result of chest tubes placed by resident physicians.7The authors believe that a web-based learning module addressing topics related to pneumothorax (pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management) would be beneficial to healthcare providers who are likely to encounter pneumothorax in clinical practice. Specifically, the web-based nature of the module would lend itself to convenient viewing and would allow for utilization as a just-in-time training modality. Presenting these topics in an animated format may also be a useful way of capturing the complex and three-dimensional nature of respiratory physiology. Additionally, the web-based format may be particularly appealing to digital native natives, who occupy an increasing percentage of resident physician positions.8 It should be noted that a number of studies have examined the use of computerized modules in medical education, and found them to be at least as useful as traditional instructional methods, and are typically associated with high rates of satisfaction among learners.9-13. Educational Objectives: By the end of this module, participants should be able to:Review the normal physiology of the pleural spaceDiscuss the pathophysiology of pneumothoraxDescribe the clinical presentation of pneumothoraxIdentify pneumothorax on a chest radiographReview treatment options for pneumothorax. Educational Methods: This is a video podcast, which conveys information through animated content. It is available to learners on demand and just-in-time for practice. It may be used as a stand-alone educational tool, as a primer to other instructional methods (eg, simulation), or a just-in-time training tool. Research Methods: A small-scale study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this module as an educational tool. The learner group consisted of a convenience sample of 11 second-year medical students at the end of their pre-clinical training. All learners were administered the attached assessment form as a pre-test, shown the video, then asked to re-take the assessment as a post-test to assess improvement. Assessments were graded on a 10-point scale according to the attached answer key. Learners were also given the opportunity to rate the quality of the module as an educational tool, as well as to provide subjective feedback. Results: The average pre-test score across all learners was 34%. The average post-test score across all learners was 82%, representing an improvement of 48%. Learners were asked to rate their agreement with the statements, "This module effectively taught concepts related to pulmonary physiology and pneumothorax," and, "The animated format of this module was useful for illustrating concepts related to pulmonary physiology and pneumothorax." All learners responded with "agree" or "strongly agree" for each statement. When given the opportunity to provide subjective feedback regarding the module, learners responded with "This module is a great review! It is well organized, has effective animations, and information is clear," and "Helpful review that explained the concepts in an accessible way!" Discussion: Results from the pre-test and post-test suggest that this module was effective in teaching concepts related to pulmonary physiology and pneumothorax. All learners reported satisfaction with the animated format in particular. These results suggest that this module would be effective as a standalone educational tool or as a primer to other instructional methods. Topics: Pneumothorax, thoracostomy, needle decompression, flipped classroom, asynchronous learning, emergency medicine.

Identifiers

PMID37465408
PMCPMC10332561
OpenAlexW4384664802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.