ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2023
Percent Recovery Index Predicts Poor Asthma Control and Exacerbation in Adults.
Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies indicate that the percent recovery index (PRI: the percentage increase from the maximally reduced FEV1 after bronchodilator inhalation), one of the indexes of methacholine bronchial provocation, may predict acute asthma exacerbations in childhood and elderly asthmatics. It is known that childhood (<12) and elder (>60) asthmatics may be different to adult patients in many aspect including prognosis. However, in adults, a research for predicting value of PRI to exacerbation is still absence. Besides exacerbation, predicting value of PRI to poor asthma control is also unknown. We try to detect whether PRI can predict poor asthma control and exacerbation in adults in this research. Meanwhile, we try to detect whether treatment can influence PRI. Methods: In 61 adults with asthma, baseline PRI was measured during enrollment. And then baseline PRI was evaluated as a predictor of exacerbation or poor asthma control at an upcoming 3-month follow-up. The covariates included age, sex, BMI, previous exacerbation, smoking status and baseline lung function. After treatment for 3 months, PRI was measured again and compared with baseline PRI. Results: After the 3-month follow-up, we found that baseline PRI was significantly related to asthma exacerbation (P = 0.023), poor asthma control (ACT at 3 months, P = 0.014), decreased quality of life (decrease of MiniAQLQ, P = 0.010) and cumulative number of EDHO at 3 months (P = 0.039). Meanwhile, no significant correlation was observed between baseline PRI and inflammation factors (FENO, CaNO, and EOS). Finally, PRI was dramatically reduced after standard treatment for 3 months. Conclusion: PRI is efficient in the prediction of poor asthma control and exacerbation in adults. The predictive value of PRI may rely on the inherent property of asthmatic airway smooth muscle (ASM) independent of inflammation factors. Effective treatment can alleviate PRI dramatically and that indicate PRI may also be valuable in evaluation of curative effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.