Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37465314›Full record

ArticleACS medicinal chemistry letters2023

The Quest for Oral PROTAC drugs: Evaluating the Weaknesses of the Screening Pipeline.

Giulia Apprato, Giuseppe Ermondi, Giulia Caron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS medicinal chemistry letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Heterobifunctional small molecules to modulate RNA function.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giulia AppratoMolecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences Department, University of Torino, Piazza Nizza 44, 10124 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6906-2849
Giuseppe ErmondiMolecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences Department, University of Torino, Piazza Nizza 44, 10124 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3710-3102
Giulia CaronMolecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences Department, University of Torino, Piazza Nizza 44, 10124 Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2417-5900

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A targeted bibliographic search exposed the deficiencies within existing PROTAC preclinical pipelines, including missing, poor-quality data and technical limitations in the experimental assays. Several recommendations are proposed to improve the efficiency of preclinical platforms for PROTACs.

Identifiers

PMID37465314
PMCPMC10351046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.