ArticleEuropean heart journal open2023
Cardiac device-related infective endocarditis need for lead extraction whatever the device according to the ESC EORP EURO-ENDO registry.
Article in European heart journal open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changing Patterns in Infective Endocarditis: A Contemporary Epidemiological Perspective.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Investigating the necessity of preoperative coronary angiography for infection-related cardiac implantable electronic device explantation.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes in CIED-related vs. left-sided infective endocarditis: a nationwide study from the NIDUS registry.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Drug-Resistant Gram-Positive Cocci as Etiological Factors of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections-Data from the EXTRACT Registry.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Extraction and reimplantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices in patients with non-surgically treated infective endocarditis: a nationwide cohort study.European heart journal open · 2026Article
- [Contemporary management of endocarditis].Herz · 2025Review
- Clinical Outcomes of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device-Related Endocarditis: An International ID-IRI Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Managing Complex Pacemaker-Associated Endocarditis With Thromboembolism in Tbilisi, Georgia: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Advanced Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography Could Play a Crucial Role in the Diagnosis of Post-Implanted Cardiomyopathy Associated with a Leadless Pacemaker System.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Predictors of Mortality in Patients with Cardiac Device-Related Infective Endocarditis.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Article
- Clinical Features and Patient Outcomes in Infective Endocarditis with Surgical Indication: A Single-Centre Experience.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
- Review
- The Predictive Value of Sepsis Scores for In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Left-Sided Infective Endocarditis.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Article
- Relevance of cardiac imaging in the evolving landscape of infective endocarditis management.Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular diseaseReview
- Pacemaker pocket histoplasmosis - A rarest of rare CIED infection.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 18 institutions in 14 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE) is a severe complication of cardiac device (CD) implantation and is usually treated by antibiotic therapy and percutaneous device extraction. Few studies report the management and prognosis of CDRIE in real life. In particular, the rate of device extraction in clinical practice and the management of patients with left heart infective endocarditis (LHIE) and an apparently non-infected CD (LHIE+CDRIE-) are not well described. Methods and results: We sought to study in EURO-ENDO, the characteristics, prognosis, and management of 483 patients with a CD included in the European Society of Cardiology EurObservational Research Programme EURO-ENDO registry. Three populations were compared: 280 isolated CDRIE (66.7 ± 14.3 years), 157 patients with LHIE and an apparently non-infected CD (LHIE+CDRIE-) (71.1 ± 13.6), and 46 patients with both LHIE and CDRIE (LHIE+CDRIE+) (70.2 ± 10.1). Echocardiography was not always transoesophageal echography (TOE); it was transthoracic echography (TTE) for isolated CDRIE in 88.4% (TOE = 67.6%), for LHIE+CDRIE- TTE = 93.0% (TOE = 58.6%), and for CDRIE+LHIE+ TTE = 87.0% (TOE = 63.0%). Nuclear imaging was performed in 135 patients (positive for 75.6%). In-hospital mortality was lower in isolated CDRIE 13.2% vs. 22.3% and 30.4% for LHIE+CDRIE- and LHIE+CDRIE+ ( Conclusion: Prognosis of endocarditis in patients with a CD remains poor, particularly in the presence of an associated LHIE. Although recommended by guidelines, device extraction is not always performed. Device removal was associated with better prognosis, even in the LHIE+CDRIE- group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.