Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37465236›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of engineering education2023

Immersion Experiences for Biomedical Engineering Undergraduates: Comparing Strategies and Local Partnerships at Two Institutions.

Justin Huber, Steven Higbee, Christina Espinosa, Babak Bazrgari, Sharon Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of engineering education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Justin HuberUniversity of Kentucky, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
Steven HigbeeIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Biomedical Engineering, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Christina EspinosaUniversity of Kentucky, Human Development Institute, Lexington, KY 40508, USA.
Babak BazrgariUniversity of Kentucky, Biomedical Engineering, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
Sharon MillerIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Biomedical Engineering, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

Funding

A Clinical Immersion Program to Train Biomedical Engineers to Identify Indiana's Urban Health NeedsR25EB031389 · NIBIB · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI Steven J. Higbee, Sharon Janell Miller · 2021 to 2026
$259k
Team-Based Design of Assistive Technology DevicesR25HD106831 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BARD, CHRISTINA ESPINOSA, BAZRGARI, BABAK · 2021 to 2022
$83k
NIBIB NIH HHS R25 EB031389NICHD NIH HHS R25 HD106831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immersion experiences for undergraduate students in biomedical engineering are key contributors to their ability to identify medical needs. Despite this, as few as 25% of surveyed programs report providing such opportunities. Since 2010 when the National Institute of Health began its R25 grant mechanism to support curricular development toward team-based design, several institutions have established programs for immersion experiences, which provide precedent for their implementation. Published results from such immersion experiences highlight successes in structure and changes in student perspectives after these experiences. As more institutions expand their biomedical engineering curriculum with new immersion-focused programs, it is important to learn from these precedents while also considering opportunities to improve. For newly funded groups that are developing and implementing programs, they may find improved success by strategic use of unique partnerships. However, these partnerships may not be immediately evident to program organizers. Our objective is to discuss two institutions that recently established programs for immersion experience. In the comparison of our two immersion programs, we found five overlapping core features that include: immersion partner collaboration, team-based immersion experiences, needs-finding emphasis, team-based engineering design experiences, and immersion assessment and evaluation. Both programs developed collaborative partnerships with nearby medical schools. Additionally, one program partnered with a community resource (i.e., Human Development Institute). Despite nuanced program differences, we found that students at both programs self-reported increased knowledge or confidence in aspects of the design process (e.g., identifying and refining user needs, concept generation). Our results also highlight student gains unique to their programs - UK students self-reported gains on disability topics and IUPUI students self-reported gains on socioeconomic awareness. In summary, immersion partner collaboration, or partnership, surfaced as a core feature for both programs, and students in both immersion programs endorsed enhanced knowledge or confidence in engineering design.

Indexed as

clinical immersionengineering designevidence-based practiceexperiential learninguser needs

Identifiers

PMID37465236
PMCPMC10353772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.