ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Genomic determinants in advanced endometrial cancer patients with sustained response to hormonal therapy- case series and review of literature.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of endometrial cancer is increasing, however treatment options for advanced disease are limited. Hormonal therapy has demonstrated positive outcomes for Stage IV EC. Next generation sequencing (NGS) has increased our understanding of molecular mechanisms driving EC. In this case series, we selected six patients at our institution with Stage IV, hormone receptor positive, endometrial cancer currently being treated with hormonal therapy. All patients achieved SD for at least ≥ 1.5 years. We studied NGS data on all six patients to assess for any common genomic marker which could predict the SD of at least 1.5 years achieved in this group. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained from Staten Island University Hospital and Northwell Health, New York. PTEN, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, and ARID1A mutations were found in 83%, 67% 50%, and 67% of patients respectively. TP53 and FGFR2 were both found in 50% of patients. All patients were positive for estrogen and/or progesterone receptor (ER+ and/or PR+). We did not find any one common mutation that could have predicted the observed response (or SD of ≥1.5 years) to hormone therapy. However, our data reflects the prevalence of various mutations reported in literature: (1) Hormone Receptor status is a positive prognostic indicator (2) PTEN/PIK3CA mutations can occur concurrently in EC (3) ARID1A coexists with PTEN (4) FGFR and PTEN pathways may be interlinked. We suggest NGS be employed frequently in patients with endometrial cancer to identify targetable mutations. Additional larger studies are needed to characterize the interplay between mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.