ArticleJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2023
Hip-Spine Discordance in Bone Mineral Densities in Patients Undergoing Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
Article in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The discordance in the diagnosis of osteoporosis is characterized by the variation in bone mineral density measurements at different skeletal sites. The presence of discordance significantly alters the treatment plan as different treatment is required for different skeletal sites. The aim of this study was to find out the prevalence of hip-spine discordance in bone mineral densities in patients undergoing dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans for suspected osteoporosis. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among patients undergoing dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans from 1 December 2020 to 30 October 2022. Ethical approval was taken from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: IRC-2020-11-18-08). Patients undergoing dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans for suspected osteoporosis were included. Patients aged less than 50 years, already diagnosed and under treatment for osteoporosis, and incomplete information about T-scores of hips and spine were excluded. Convenience sampling method was used. Point estimate and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated. Results: Among 1028 patients, 602 (58.56%) (55.55-61.57, 95% Confidence Interval) had discordance in hip and spine bone mineral densities. The majority of them, 570 (94.68%) were female and 32 (5.71%) were male. Major discordance was observed in 101 (16.77%) patients and minor discordance was observed in 501 (83.22%) patients. Conclusions: The prevalence of discordance in hip and spine bone mineral densities in patients undergoing dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans was higher than that reported in other similar studies done in similar settings. Keywords: bone density; osteoporosis; prevalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.