ArticleJournal of dental research2023
Machine Learning Analysis of Microtensile Bond Strength of Dental Adhesives.
Article in Journal of dental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Evaluation of Dental Composite Restorations: A Scoping Review.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Large Language Models and Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Dental Ceramics Performance.International dental journal · 2026Article
- The influence of different factors on the bond strength of lithium disilicate-reinforced glass-ceramics to Resin: a machine learning analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dental adhesives provide retention to composite fillings in dental restorations. Microtensile bond strength (µTBS) test is the most used laboratory test to evaluate bonding performance of dental adhesives. The traditional approach for developing dental adhesives involves repetitive laboratory measurements, which consumes enormous time and resources. Machine learning (ML) is a promising tool for accelerating this process. This study aimed to develop ML models to predict the µTBS of dental adhesives using their chemical features and to identify important contributing factors for µTBS. Specifically, the chemical composition and µTBS information of 81 dental adhesives were collected from the manufacturers and the literature. The average µTBS value of each adhesive was labeled as either 0 (if <36 MPa) or 1 (if ≥36 MPa) to denote the low and high µTBS classes. The initial 9-feature data set comprised pH, HEMA, BisGMA, UDMA, MDP, PENTA, filler, fluoride, and organic solvent (OS) as input features. Nine ML algorithms, including logistic regression, k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, decision trees and tree-based ensembles, and multilayer perceptron, were implemented for model development. Feature importance analysis identified MDP, pH, OS, and HEMA as the top 4 contributing features, which were used to construct a 4-feature data set. Grid search with stratified 10-fold cross-validation (CV) was employed for hyperparameter tunning and model performance evaluation using 2 metrics, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy. The 4-feature data set generated slightly better performance than the 9-feature data set, with the highest AUC score of 0.90 and accuracy of 0.81 based on stratified CV. In conclusion, ML is an effective tool for predicting dental adhesives with low and high µTBS values and for identifying important chemical features contributing to the µTBS. The ML-based data-driven approach has great potential to accelerate the discovery of new dental adhesives and other dental materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.