Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37464585›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2023

The relationship between the systemic immune-inflammation index and reverse-dipper circadian pattern in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.

Muammer Karakayali, Timor Omar, Inanç Artac, İbrahim Rencuzogullari, Yavuz Karabag, Ozturk Demir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muammer KarakayaliDepartment of Cardiology, Kafkas University School of Medicine, Kars, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7385-120X
Timor OmarDepartment of Cardiology, Kafkas University School of Medicine, Kars, Turkey.
Inanç ArtacDepartment of Cardiology, Kafkas University School of Medicine, Kars, Turkey.
İbrahim RencuzogullariDepartment of Cardiology, Kafkas University School of Medicine, Kars, Turkey.
Yavuz KarabagDepartment of Cardiology, Kafkas University School of Medicine, Kars, Turkey.
Ozturk DemirDepartment of Cardiology, Kafkas University School of Medicine, Kars, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although hypertension is considered high intravascular pressure, impairing circadian blood pressure (BP) has been shown to potentially contribute to poor clinical outcomes. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), based on platelet, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts, has been established as a strong prognostic marker in cardiovascular disease. The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of hypertension is a well-known issue and inflammatory markers are associated with BP variability. We aimed to investigate whether there is a relationship between circadian BP changes and SII in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. The study population consisted of 196 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients without LVH. In total, 76 (38%) patients had a dipper BP pattern, 60 (31%) patients had a non-dipper BP pattern, and 60 (31%) patients had a reverse-dipper BP pattern. SII was calculated according to Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed SII and HDL-C as an independent predictors of reverse-dipper circadian pattern in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. The cut-off value of the SII for reverse-dipper hypertension in a ROC curve analysis was >639.73 with 63.3% sensitivity and 84.2% specificity. Our study showed that the SII level was higher in the reverse-dipper hypertension patient group than in the dipper and non-dipper hypertension groups. Furthermore, SII was an independent predictor of newly diagnosed reverse-dipper hypertensive patients. The high SII value in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients can be used as an early warning parameter to identify reverse-dipper hypertension patients.

Indexed as

HypertensionBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCircadian RhythmHumansInflammationambulatory blood pressure monitoringcircadian blood pressure, hypertension, reverse-dipper, Systemic immune-inflammation index

Identifiers

PMID37464585
PMCPMC10423764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.