Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37464423›Full record

ArticleBioelectronic medicine2023

Stimulation parameters for directional vagus nerve stimulation.

Joel Villalobos, Sophie C Payne, Glenn M Ward, Sofianos Andrikopoulos, Tomoko Hyakumura, Richard J MacIsaac, James B Fallon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioelectronic medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joel VillalobosBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Sophie C PayneBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Glenn M WardBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Sofianos AndrikopoulosAustralian Centre for Accelerating Diabetes Innovations, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Tomoko HyakumuraBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Richard J MacIsaacBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
James B FallonBionics Institute, East Melbourne, Vic, Australia. jfallon@bionicsinstitute.org.
Bionics Institute · AUAustin Health · AU

Funding

Bionics Institute Incubation Fund PINT022Cass Foundation 8511St. Vincent's Research Endowment Fund 85257University of Melbourne's Early Career Researcher Grants Scheme 1757246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutonomic nerve stimulation is used as a treatment for a growing number of diseases. We have previously demonstrated that application of efferent vagus nerve stimulation (eVNS) has promising glucose lowering effects in a rat model of type 2 diabetes. This paradigm combines high frequency pulsatile stimulation to block nerve activation in the afferent direction with low frequency stimulation to activate the efferent nerve section. In this study we explored the effects of the parameters for nerve blocking on the ability to inhibit nerve activation in the afferent direction. The overarching aim is to establish a blocking stimulation strategy that could be applied using commercially available implantable pulse generators used in the clinic.

methodsMale rats (n = 20) had the anterior abdominal vagus nerve implanted with a multi-electrode cuff. Evoked compound action potentials (ECAP) were recorded at the proximal end of the electrode cuff. The efficacy of high frequency stimulation to block the afferent ECAP was assessed by changes in the threshold and saturation level of the response. Blocking frequency and duty cycle of the blocking pulses were varied while maintaining a constant 4 mA current amplitude.

resultsDuring application of blocking at lower frequencies (≤ 4 kHz), the ECAP threshold increased (ANOVA, p < 0.001) and saturation level decreased (p < 0.001). Application of higher duty cycles (> 70%) led to an increase in evoked neural response threshold (p < 0.001) and a decrease in saturation level (p < 0.001). During the application of a constant pulse width and frequency (1 or 1.6 kHz, > 70% duty cycle), the charge delivered per pulse had a significant influence on the magnitude of the block (ANOVA, p = 0.003), and was focal (< 2 mm range).

conclusionsThis study has determined the range of frequencies, duty cycles and currents of high frequency stimulation that generate an efficacious, focal axonal block of a predominantly C-fiber tract. These findings could have potential application for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Indexed as

Bioelectric medicineMedical devicesMetabolic diseaseNerve blockingPeripheral nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID37464423
PMCPMC10353120
OpenAlexW4384663789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.