Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37464020›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2024

Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: development and external validation of a model.

Gijsbert M Kalisvaart, Thomas Van Den Berghe, Willem Grootjans, Maryse Lejoly, Wouter C J Huysse, Judith V M G Bovée, David Creytens, Hans Gelderblom, Frank M Speetjens, Lore Lapeire and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gijsbert M KalisvaartDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. G.M.Kalisvaart@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3531-3640
Thomas Van Den BergheDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Willem GrootjansDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Maryse LejolyDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Wouter C J HuysseDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Judith V M G BovéeDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
David CreytensDepartment of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Hans GelderblomDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Frank M SpeetjensDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lore LapeireDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Michiel A J van de SandeDepartment of Orthopedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gwen SysDepartment of Orthopedics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Lioe-Fee de Geus-OeiDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Koenraad L VerstraeteDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Johan L BloemDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

Philips LEI-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify which dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-)MRI features best predict histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with an osteosarcoma.

methodsPatients with osteosarcoma who underwent DCE-MRI before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to resection were retrospectively included at two different centers. Data from the center with the larger cohort (training cohort) was used to identify which method for region-of-interest selection (whole slab or focal area method) and which change in DCE-MRI features (time to enhancement, wash-in rate, maximum relative enhancement and area under the curve) gave the most accurate prediction of histological response. Models were created using logistic regression and cross-validated. The most accurate model was then externally validated using data from the other center (test cohort).

resultsFifty-five (27 poor response) and 30 (19 poor response) patients were included in training and test cohorts, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient of relative DCE-MRI features ranged 0.81-0.97 with the whole slab and 0.57-0.85 with the focal area segmentation method. Poor histological response was best predicted with the whole slab segmentation method using a single feature threshold, relative wash-in rate <2.3. Mean accuracy was 0.85 (95%CI: 0.75-0.95), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-index) was 0.93 (95%CI: 0.86-1.00). In external validation, accuracy and AUC-index were 0.80 and 0.80.

conclusionIn this study, a relative wash-in rate of <2.3 determined with the whole slab segmentation method predicted histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma. Consistent performance was observed in an external test cohort.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsOsteosarcomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDynamic contrast-enhanced MRIExternal validationHistological responseNeoadjuvant chemotherapyOsteosarcomaResponse monitoring

Identifiers

PMID37464020
PMCPMC10730632
OpenAlexW4384661617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.